From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792468089; b=jmLkvkxzEDcZIv896odtJqnZ33zMbfv+GfUEWw3UYhEmwo30pdZg+bk4c3kb9r7KvwnX gwAm/7npZXO4v1z3uIRv0jcq+W7ybE4LsHdmng8VR7VV4R/4QckgZDnN17bDGwdH8F/fB oFTr6uf7dsMu7bsGKlH8l4c/0vFv8EQOI2M6t0r6xwBs3cWmHH2ji+s3Re1c+PTwGl7jq 1/otC+vgM4z2BR7pdRxRvIT4u1jZlf8DP+H7JrL4xRcgH3Yh5fmRt9Amuoh3/VdeXzk1R HSAUTGCmXQ2IqJx4b/3Z9FDx7sLo1uIU4xOpJRaTBJ539RYpVMtiwm5TDCEbTWySJ9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792468089; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; b=Bc7z7/t8ceUF4M0DlG7shX2EyfNSQkfigq4lZk5vt81yWbDtx9ywMGNryan+H+PNsoj5 QBLESbVFlJhZBMtFiBozCKnOuKUUcxYUUPOrtAl3LR6w2gkYQiAN9O+r4BFj1+r9eRQFm jj5noE5v0WEtWNIy9Myy2UjDlpDuptVC00h4tCdsboD6gl7V8WOksgyDgqxJbt3IC6seV fZhhqJFIoYZ3iL+sxD83vMfc4vkonpldlc1/ki/5vSYrVPlvtfAt/xmY3GLxzIUCr5zL4 yNl/vXjodTBTt12w+J2AZsUYfrq24PEGCfxEvWUTfTKSQNqoVrLNmx/omPgWCI65A1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=TX2qi0ZP; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56217606A319; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 03:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=TX2qi0ZP Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB2EC1F000C4; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 03:48:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792468088; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=TX2qi0ZPaD/9PxYAwt/dOgQmAEkIYvN4zOvspgJGmh3DtZ9T6i2JzeP/HVyuCFSn1 +C0UQo1WjuCsrfTYJ3jcqliDHZSd7X1mc+KO+6HiiCdjMSxNgfuAu+K0cQpaaNtgNy 6R/fMycg28ae36ddVnr21lKiBS07Bk+ZmndrRZtat63RgKQ1NdRAnXNqpMEd+yQXVw kwUGbP6P3VfdZWccAsH3s4YJGRXs0N1r+WOA/DU0GYFEF4fmOjhNHOdfw8uvdWe49t f4rf6UFNX832ENG7c+KFFiJzui7VSYOMPCohmzse1xLGJ4faWjn0tnWgcAmJBy77ts rM5Jz9IzGZxWw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Henry Martin Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , Simon Horman , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Ido Schimmel , Petr Machata , Ferruh Yigit , Antoine Tenart , Ilya Maximets , Seungwon Bae , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] vxlan: reject adding a remote to a nexthop fdb entry Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 03:48:07 +0000 Message-ID: <179246808735.3290.16512552225994896963@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261020034531.1420194-1-bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> References: <20261020034531.1420194-1-bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.