From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792489708; b=YQGMWsfl2PZqHpuzxvsXhiQK91mMRFKKUQigK0uWq1LmWUD70ao7Sz3KEqmSnSo+wH/+ sXfyC9nm2r615qVknGar/hxaCc401qqlEH3TwE5tuhZ/lEWT+8Gf9LUGOwEkR7lMN1zta q/73tZTK+dDmdvnIwUTqGqUuVSQm9DkyMtkDkcHvpzeQHTaCRVS+IQZLlLBWdmXCARgwL FmlMZYTCMj5KaVBasIj76ojItJLWkcdlOMdZttL82MuFN1F3v67DXmlGWqH3V5Y4l+cgD oS+gyaBYD0IO91FGv4An8QyK80c3g4dnxfMUA3V+x6jhbp29gX0m3XcY5Z5q/5pObaA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792489708; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=T2pUOwULdMQRQF2BRI5DkMaNkVBjQIe+0hhO00dCMT6F9yLrFSVDUC9JoIusKVdxgoQu 8K0eoAhYSqkP0liYbFAEZsFtZdkZpFEWW9XFkfRXHPS3lfhx/joOC2SxrZpc9gOi1ZRkl 4znVGQPh2tozNDxzdmLJnvy3mQq3Vjgshaq4FpTJ38DHkt7lNgcRvcwE9fyP1BDKjrDY8 yObFWDMAzDGofdklhXTcl4UmmyevL46oCGeSi6KqIPdzHIK1BoUYURg90C+rhSbY160cL U0hWlEHzPU238Q0xcCzfV7fmWo5s/bOX42l/Imczsl/sk7Ut/1U1chl+przGowcnDNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=bY9VA6dS; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA8A606A319; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=bY9VA6dS Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F5241F000C4; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:48:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792489707; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=bY9VA6dSEs2HbxjGvNK9JohXLPYVMAmF0EG/I++H4TG/w6oCtTmOPY16Whh/4+2bl CUs4PSpHuwCDwGEnbI2LtYeCZ9a5Ye6FTUWG2DRvjzqlHQ+Z7Cy+gmp9zqMpjxVLE4 p4iPtwY/pmPi7l4HVmvu1mhseCk9+TyxpXJIzQoH8CyugTiIYUKnI0GKg3YyYUHXAD baaG4/Jb9gP+X+BAqW8EwcjKgLxA5Y33Kbpc7yJQFrR10EQN5CuewQpn8d/wB28H0p D/c0FJbd9VLuHCHQojnHJdTIxZrk1gaxjzrRF7C/WM7ue4RsjmIPjzEDCyd+pYiOtg 9NgKEE7CM5YSQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: liuc63 Cc: M Chetan Kumar , Loic Poulain , Sergey Ryazanov , Johannes Berg , Fang Xieyan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: iosm: validate msg_head before indexing msg_ring Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:48:26 +0000 Message-ID: <179248970663.3290.12171983741901955198@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261020094254.4017726-1-liuc63@xiaopeng.com> References: <20261020094254.4017726-1-liuc63@xiaopeng.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.