From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792611502; b=I/ucdtmYEbO9ARlLpXH7GDqCK4+lQv28mpVpA6dwj7fDZXHKtlo5NshF/Tln5+DNqXlJ xn9jTo+HfZEnonIZmHVXt6KsXW0b+2GqYfxXZhsP8NYPH5iaHctjOGidIqkl4ggnUq7aD JObaK9RYeAysfAxvYsaIiWhP/j+5L9NvbI6PNNDgGioAIVwoudAJcKeKpi7m3tkPnWn+m kVYcNu5OJeK00eZ11MuSqHorBWng8jj4ZNcf1Zwm76cZDjBGIU8720mfv3ySpFOLrAmU9 M4d9WNRBIglBVcFLxLZSm5F0m8zKQo+U1ZV7RYzZDFttpqmb6JrxNtg6rhQ/ng24rvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792611502; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=CkYQgiQUTNjWzLvekhzWBPzyb+2FoArIfMxMunavEW3uSskh7F6NpkAEYsPgD/i3OCTJ bOWW6UGuewi2l/jTjkQYmtatQnATTPzVipeQRxvP5FuIKhTxkTkls9UbrVHYj1e8syWFA JfSxNF0gvOsnsUztDGXYIE6O38CiFZJ5RgNFt9RCzELaiY6d6LCVq44GCRnZQwlh0TRzI eW0YC2W6puiDt+3rOYUUt3xQcD5ACycqWObyav7Lbi0ArtO7ZrXndEtt1gFr47VJSpDyW q/Q+snkClEIDm8Dv/gCXj0Ukwc+SkXAVwaU2EPGcpO6RbG1zYmTy4U453ezqePQ1okg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=kJGF4hzI; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 237FE606A31A; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=kJGF4hzI Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62EFC1F000C1; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792611501; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=kJGF4hzIvMEd9ibKNlucw7rb8beXp8+vQC5N8G6LlEUM0PQ3mH7TxEHSdtsHgtWB2 nhndT+PkAeIxAyjQ83Hhf6b2KiQ6bspPRVLRwsqzMoXY1Sm8YXI/IHoyNBKptGEZuj hKyNUSXW8zuz/DLPXZbPpe8ctVfqfYWWwnoLXex8DuOWkujFqYBs11HdJeOtQkHmQy PsPXAYqg5i9L4c5oVz0XUJVXj2aeOZ6Fhu5fzSqs45FVTep3If65mVyOFbYMlR3r8Z gpeQyv0DWwU0h/QqYYqb48o8qwcZj1DbRmbo8VTiX9oFWFMuUiGYs4VH0XGtcJ+Ypa 5MkHElctjm9Pw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Jean Cc: Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix authentication bypass via unsupported TCP auth options Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:38:20 +0000 Message-ID: <179261150089.3290.10796131741281208278@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261021193151.1819085-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> References: <20261021193151.1819085-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.