From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Cc: UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: lan969x: don't disable hardirqs in fdma tx clear
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 00:30:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179262901059.1378903.1270598313678764253.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-lan969x-fdma-tx-clear-irq-v1-1-b9f9d1eda317@microchip.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:57:27 +0200 you wrote:
> lan969x_fdma_tx_clear_buf() runs from the NAPI poll and frees the skbs
> of completed tx DCBs with napi_consume_skb(), under sparx5->tx_lock.
>
> Before this patch, the lock is taken with spin_lock_irqsave(), so the
> skbs are freed with hardirqs disabled. RX skbs are marked for page_pool
> recycling, so when such an skb is forwarded back out and its tx
> completion frees it here, the free path reaches __page_pool_put_page(),
> which warns via lockdep_assert_no_hardirq().
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: lan969x: don't disable hardirqs in fdma tx clear
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/9770818b8a92
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 8:57 Daniel Machon
2026-10-22 0:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179262901059.1378903.1270598313678764253.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®