From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792663392; b=w47HdD5Y3IPsSR8tBJBKPe7ADb3zBMmoi2mnMC2SH+azFyJzHICl6ww6DfVfS4e3YFmz HslyE/7qayAQ6jHgSNmPO3sA7qtJD0OIO5EBCmtr2Fv892R7BLfXTcooAF0I87wnqPvuc q8imaY7PwA/UWqT1Dtvcet4azvROBa8oQh+SJve99D+d/7ZccOSH/YKMyldNaU2mVzcdF iJjhEQQIMVtvjuSd7cp4FMs9VhldraWbSFfHaTtPyHR8jXwx4WIuntLNwc4ctPN6ZOOb0 IFlRRynTJnNPk/dQeHPMrS1AcLa0Z0rzzOd9XSbvlq/+mI8iPpc00PQQ7rxoVUXE7Dg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792663392; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=d77M0x8e/wZZO9+jhMjnDBMzX+6H05XzDJFWFjExTtTv4IzAiGR0TYLkL14P6peWajbp 5L64Id0WyCCSPi590lVfhHDrDFOTeBrEXKKft08lOBPRQn3lE7pLFMox+fj7SaKZK49A2 SfiUhHcc9iJ9TrsX3iBpOUpOVqEV+8OCyN8W4qr66mly342+zEEnx5G6RLiyxTs7kkRXZ r7Jm3SbTMPP8IoFN0fY/jYMPb/Db5fX2raqQY/H4FZcbxfYvI8qA0KcX0822VMkdqkJF5 dPCsh3Ep5BCL9TyhJHM0qLsfJjyaFDQ37YLoH2NBpEkQofizPq31EhzOzIVNEUvlklg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=YB5obVEn; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E665606A32F; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 10:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=YB5obVEn Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D1C51F000C1; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 10:03:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792663391; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=YB5obVEn6prZEpAh3lVidgQj8DoL1YoYmWeM6YAi0gVLCZaqkNPbfajHjbAgp1OZA rLdKAwK5YqkRbh21npc9/wqv73O8lSVMdi52fisufsA97WfOZV2Tffv7LbN72oLk3k fAB7yQ7WP4/YTlWY4GSI30z1U5jXN/RjLCeuudigDSthpeZXgSKOHkkoY3I9E6mY2R ezVb0/AymNrl7OPfxClVoazO5/FJYfnSRkiVRtB+DaN5XglCNzCgP4LIWEoppDSl49 LdLblLytwIWkaDMKYv+TcdxKivWNNGWDGVgEpb5TaSNV6idbXAMQItktko7KVVgixv rMLlTbVaKzbvg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Rui Qi Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, John Fastabend , Jakub Sitnicki , Jiayuan Chen , Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Daniel Borkmann , Levi Zim , "open list:BPF [L7 FRAMEWORK] (sockmap)" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf, sockmap: Propagate sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter error code Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 10:03:10 +0000 Message-ID: <179266339055.3290.10579295938182930016@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261022095853.1829161-1-qirui.001@bytedance.com> References: <20261022095853.1829161-1-qirui.001@bytedance.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.