From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792720071; b=jTiVEj54LireDR2/Ck2mMfg+ZWiBBhz+YbJTbYZVyUlwcqEf05Y8wbX7rTGnc+yyG/hF k/y4nXnr7tjtnlk82hBl7Rj2WdeKzc92T7Fos/CyZOCWIhedUs0+hGei4TsLvdxJl7NZY CyWzkOh+CdOLPJ/u0d8NBv91p7V4Ayqv/euGlIBNqNlbHlXqHuCv3qn3rRyGsC2xA2hVr hUd+eup6qWGBMCpPS8Io3jkTTEmzisil9CFUtomTF8vkPakv9i+jBuray/tzQ7Ht99xV4 1k3wZCanTVjLXBoJxmzboUQkZwsH6G2Pkz+IO8VdmMnHTAaPXa4l06RRhcnNqH7hfvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792720071; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=dQ7KkT6GrFWwijC1PtzIUFnfNvc0aDRF2y82iv2Uq8Zbtk5UPAk/qR0E0DWnmuXXMHOS 51whzgBfR3fuqdQR83rxk19aTo4AmP4hfBffMiFPbwVf/dOSfX76rnl4zBI9dbrrSZ7z/ jgX6CbMfuf22y/aqdceMAXLukNqIJWgqgi1iqQufE1DhOgTg/KCHbdGDXOpZrAL6QDBZW cksiKkUGlpaMyu4qHpg0qqj7Q96D7u+rsOg2f/xr4H1f3U26/GyXDeV6tXbQ0w6Ja1q8z WkRqOcMYNuc5Uq2a3ZmLwXwGsmNMV567ibhj+1Gw4AwQ43AI5aeWqKU41TcTa7wplJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=EivCozqC; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC20606A319; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=EivCozqC Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C4951F01825; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:47:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792720071; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=EivCozqCvOFIeZF0iWmtKjKWEbn04u6/NlCwWcs1Nr8huUwoAyIv53JA1LnLHqdzQ Y1j8QwKaHN4TEGAGBzrhDP9ru/blMFyXF89rLNExAvp+Un6RsAidfF6MPl/sVwVngJ 9xEorUg02W8rsSl1yrfRq7vArMj+4T1ungi6A0uCLPF09KnlAEtnjudmWBa8hPCGxc ad4NgHnVjnhZcsJ1X44UwW9BFlKKRdAzgGbsYKoDMvQYdzaQ+YWu+cJWFara2nTRLN UgZTH1gf4uTmJz+91Oc12Ubf39vvY4ccS4RAKVM8nqoXp9MHRMVa/KMMXF42+flP2U rN9+RPQhcAubw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: David Corvaglia Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev, Nikolay Aleksandrov , Ido Schimmel , Horatiu Vultur , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: mrp: fix silent truncation of IN_ID Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:47:49 +0000 Message-ID: <179272006987.3327.3277225611746854121@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261023014536.72444-1-david@corvaglia.dev> References: <20261023014536.72444-1-david@corvaglia.dev> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.