From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792740135; b=5s1g/Y72h3jU718GtmDznNFJuVTj8iI0u2dNKzParoo/skzL+tISmbWJTuaq4oPAajI8 R5DWEWIkAsl6Hz9uH7BI65AFMRirjydCj7MGD0hVOKHrkEwFm/jDNWLw5nmtMcuA2Ny1m Yc95oHErhbBMoC3C3MOZDhlsD77+tUNUlBGn33c/wBpciV9C/rRgb5xEk5jJRXjZniyLo OqrYSsiBou0HJ/x24pB2ANrmVP2QV5Pa1dFDd76F/t2qpumNTctVDN+pyo0Pt8amo2Ljz nHqCN52UYvSVkSN3kwlDf8ImLwKmoVOhBvC1XeOOChd9RHn3vCfk7L9NwCJw++wXtxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792740135; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; b=CM/njSeqFBLXvplOoRpykdmkEi5F3MCLAfBA/f0GYOMwhuICNUbABtHbv46AhQ+uyXaa 6mZZEuCYGRnPBYgBzt3W38hTYyT7YN1Iw6TP0I3VZ9hMZyiinupJF+Nh9d4+NVyox0Yri lrj6YuJMqhvXfOdts+FjRCEEN521QbKoCPJc4wuiDHYPL5HICko8gNzLKtsrB+A5QlnjP yn3dsubuJkPf0Mw2rnidqUwq3INgr3i2C2Ah8R/Q8UXV2OsIhIxl/kRQFGwQj45GGDw1R vNLfTpLJ9inGevbih40soQFjxf1Sc4AfFeqT8xNvbncXll1diNb22r3sPoHnrLEIr1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=c9H6RRWa; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E75606A31D; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=c9H6RRWa Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C9F51F01828; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:22:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792740135; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=c9H6RRWawM7mpyJV6lfng6L6eINK3xNWSCVY4ECHpLMsu5r7Dts0/GaQs5yPOWj3E 03shcu2NJSNVSbJhpAuH+nsHhOiGTZ0QLRnexO4t9rkhte4kQBWJ9Ui+bHoIh1WfBW QZxyUleFAZHrYFEuZ4T3XA6/luhTztbWB2YYrzomymLYSMUj3ki3C05rz/T2yDZmoJ ALC6HZ0QWP71SWEKcjIKJ/cyJFzVFiqG+XDQoacbzHRO8S5NJnHhsRm+tyy6g60qoV Ugt+bbWQoA4pMi5904TTIt35sBa+3SImaNhNVZ+ahZeLLM2LLYZmapcuhUWopaL4GY f9Ik3dFLesATA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: kmahammadraf Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Sunil Goutham , Ratheesh Kannoth , Geetha sowjanya , Subbaraya Sundeep , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Kiran Kumar K Subject: Re: [PATCH net] octeontx2-af: fix inner LC ltype match for RSS flowkey Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:22:13 +0000 Message-ID: <179274013393.3327.15225984916591567903@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261023071905.2922825-1-kmahammadraf@marvell.com> References: <20261023071905.2922825-1-kmahammadraf@marvell.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.