From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792741694; b=GqJImU4FLST84D+iCRNtnV3JFr+Lu68ewkHUoSWj6RY9Ai+ednFTh0G5mmOxkszXTNZy Hd8uvoGnimBLcHSi8WWkEtuCQWx1kMFWtIY8ttxef/zsOjsLb3ajmQ7smQ0sUoFSz2mTa xraHHs8kB9x7lXGlDKHw5PSD2w9+1Rq9FsDVloiEW61ONMR3rt2usSV4vVTgbuBC6eDJ6 neJID2SlXXyHXKBJATtXTjWggNRvnyHRLXwQ6sKqBrl7Rk4BSqo6U59nc4bmPNkDKv4+z nMqhHsmjAG+6t1ajQPvrDQ9WWdu56866SCzUR022VJW4K7CI9uqMnAD7DxSnRk0s9Rw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792741694; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=EiZ8lOPfizBDUpiAnQfsOSdnB/G+LbpHrUN7eD8vABPEeel+mMMs0Pu5FfHxh8A6kvw+ pz4FGrcs3uYmZSdOIr/8OftuR67pZkshvY2PxMNwqzDAAGq9SUtoAJuU/XI9XMZdN56qs sU+Td54HbMJ9m3NhpKUSXvjWmGNWw8MGzZafs8dLb/yF3LZYNjEgyGXQag+6OVB9gySgt NBKZ1dGBGEUICtZnRnvwZMCOGnLS2Ce/K4lAYbfpv7XLKJCQPzJ0CjT595baNnAU0JOmn R5GMW5P5XAdK5IAfTo7GEkHNcUCvTIWuX9HQt07CRgh4didc2W5TQffu60jvdfYYJoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=EuX1rlNZ; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1046606A31A; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=EuX1rlNZ Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEA1C1F01825; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:48:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792741693; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=EuX1rlNZvyN8pEYl+oUYkS1Ewo+8EK9QVbelEq8mtGTKqR7cN83VSV8eAmHLxW3Bd jI3D+XJuSgCSNk8Il1pnRXS6XCLHdNBxwGHGNN8ATzT6jf5NFCwTPoqobu3tm9HtSz OYl/WlGWUOLR1hdi8eLnLnYOubCQjMGTIFN/t+0Ri2nES1Wwwjlm/rFINyNnL6Q3om UJOVgnPxnzhQIQnKlqd6po8cLMNgbVwzs0ebL9qjHzGldScA3rtThKuAdPzN+nGPXF bt95OO8YO/hTq5D8NcFlqMg8hEln2vB47yH7iXtM90cb1bqV7NH0AvhpkBbxULwTQQ BFvAe7Rmm8e9Q== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Jean Cc: Steffen Klassert , Herbert Xu , David Ahern , Ido Schimmel , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet: frags: prevent acceptance of partially authenticated reassembly Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:48:12 +0000 Message-ID: <179274169251.3327.5424575942192002457@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261023074515.2347924-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> References: <20261023074515.2347924-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.