From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792781693; b=4ctGOb/WtPLkPLSqYO9sxfh+q7yOGUbpudiJ8+SBw8Bua+QC7sjVPtqvcrAgfotT1p7f 7kLaE0hzDq880V4MeH5UR+44sv/H0S9JUGTTwi2FTt68rwxFL2xfvrcRZ9loTMCi4ES4U wuMyAGCsssKbv1NzUpEUV2XGc/7vHmI/GdojV5/syjat1EaA6V3aTXl9lbKG0xuSo2b7e rXOll5bTFjwoYJWnMxyqF2CkIP04W0FNzcIIUOJkRR4Op0l1C84Z0qiFtdLInfGrki3Gn 2I44aOENLCF3GoGbc4IECYUoOeIsCnkLs4a6MDMwl3Qg8zZ4/Z3L+1/ZdNLGFLkCzGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792781693; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=5JeCLuqqMDUTG5R1UF22Ayp5Yo1Dsg+yKJhacFl6/Cis3RfymOnJKpza8yAVhC1wiSaJ KnQX8JKd2vCOL7iGUrc8s0EZGYqRlJ5G2xXIIpvHQxVjsKWTy3jU3mSEVd+fnDwY2TnyO mEaUTLdr8S2Ws+dPSCTMD477fPH8iBSkI5EDSzMa7aqcD+6jnGG1bvyLUjc7hZE5BlmXX c5oy9mkIrGToqjo192PLMtu3oOBXm0DSlMGTZsLAz21BJJn5hJL86lSNTTbq3C52Ro3aI sfL9OD2/t4iVFD1ccgN2sIriaMiux6rmDQazypakhms754lDViJydu7+3xXrlls4NSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="h/kuyFSY"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46032606A31A; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=h/kuyFSY Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B9031F01825; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:54:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792781692; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=h/kuyFSYxROdjj8btkzQ8jS9IqFVU2SoKrWR6SfdS+hAtSfj0DdFdt/sIEsCuJHH3 bjiO32/jDDDq/tDHMHhRTA8iAyeeWjAOjC9zd4y7mj9WHuMrk8AQysW2mbwbpTHJYR LI1jP6vcMm4yMF8JhmHffnkGI4Y21cIjtb0N31Gy20ySWPYYH+MajKOfi4sqrtVKgK vjfT7ffPk9bV0iZQSFnoX9yNl9vGgXliT8rNOHaSr+nwpBxxEZ3xP3tsu/G4Iwtij7 qpz4eeipcAqqT5+L22EPDqvOD7ORAIYHjc0t4gbK0+cXZSrebEJTMm49z9f6GCtW2H XsXUMel7bf9tQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Jean Cc: Steffen Klassert , Herbert Xu , David Ahern , Ido Schimmel , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] inet: frags: prevent acceptance of partially authenticated reassembly Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:54:51 +0000 Message-ID: <179278169172.3327.18212871676528933059@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261023185118.2588450-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> References: <20261023185118.2588450-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.