From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792785310; b=oECQVaa0Zkct6fxv0voeYsvv0R2uJ04zKbFDCQdg5pAkV94lOGnIXzkg4KNX4vV2v1Eg Ve4r43h1EjJfs+nM6uXdxRNClcDvbtn5q/NjjvSgYu5uLv+IAoOEzrW464WLv+9BqFhoD PlvMuFU8phDoh/fZTFuGXq0EpAtAEskhfO9SU4oQSJGeQfxMTdGtVKsgz+Wupzkzy9C9+ L7hRcNHqYDbkkWIZ5KXST0tkPaKolLBzkncvcxq+H87OBQiv8qX3vn9JVB31uBM+ucRyF WnsCdtw5fN9vUiGMkGBtQLPZZUPv6/eR1fM8n5KQtrmzg/GEYZlDnKzWfgz4QE98Qdw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792785310; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=1L1/mahKtRoRcmNgi4aGIWMdd9Mb0jQVD3EjXzQfav1J2ZWtgbFRrHF07oVSvVYcfFU1 qiE5suc9kFhElH5qhUi2ut9Zihi52CHyh7CUqPo2P6kAHc52KM/8RiRkvdEkWeRKiDvG/ MJzsCj+HCDdWJHKCpMUgo0ms6Tw8qvpzoVrzJlw/vaN9QiJ4k7SVpFt5mn9Csz9Tp+HF4 WbYKTzydIMq/pX/UsfsYl/Yn2gI8QuB5/xqL8BCBM8X0vN3rRJu26hIZwduWXQHhyWy3c z+IcQANuHGo9E5POgMjzJ+bVofiTZ2sKNV1pEm8JFy/yk7TjbMy6tRBiojy62jtYSDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=NC52wE2K; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2E2060A3803; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 19:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=NC52wE2K Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29E8E1F031E5; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 19:55:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792785309; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=NC52wE2KMfWLaOAcV+cS8hmbbEsfAgyuQop22zsFH7iMa3h/444qLIzj3MRF43Nmr 2DdTl5OEupGVN0HNmXP7E5+eAsnAhSjUg7lX9zKvHe8dOg7FHj4jWHUtnXWA7iGBot zSBhqHvFJFmGZBoggfoc5OPAiEFbeJ+vHaoPebH+DBlZ1BOeeWczzmgPSvkeXt/C1p OKLxx7kP0KDoWZtZ+XEHEeh9D+LTwAaT+LN6HGYgSFb1ys2Vki8Nq9tRObxhKoiOlv JwS8V01vtb/239JDxRzGcnmgUFvhr/PB+7t46nAlyuFuuARjBNSQMJatQrjTcWc/yF /VYoljf/lxWAg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Tristan Madani Cc: Steffen Klassert , Herbert Xu , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Tristan Madani Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: fix output state cache TOCTOU in xfrm_state_find() Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 19:55:08 +0000 Message-ID: <179278530870.3327.6992676893660130130@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261023195323.3528192-1-tristmd@gmail.com> References: <20261023195323.3528192-1-tristmd@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.