From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261759AbVHEOi2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:38:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262272AbVHEOiR (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:38:17 -0400 Received: from dvhart.com ([64.146.134.43]:20864 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261759AbVHEOgL (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:36:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:36:04 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: James Bottomley , Andrew Morton Cc: Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List , bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5003] New: Problem with symbios driver on recent -mm trees Message-ID: <179280000.1123252564@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <1123251892.5003.6.camel@mulgrave> References: <135040000.1123216397@[10.10.2.4]> <20050804233927.2d3abb16.akpm@osdl.org> <1123251892.5003.6.camel@mulgrave> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --James Bottomley wrote (on Friday, August 05, 2005 09:24:52 -0500): > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 23:39 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> James, could some of the scsi core rework have caused this? > > Well, I don't think so. The error below: > >> > sdc: Unit Not Ready, sense: >> > : Current: sense key=0x0 >> > ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0 >> > target0:0:10: FAST-40 WIDE SCSI 80.0 MB/s DT (25 ns, offset 31) >> > Device not ready. >> > target0:0:10: FAST-40 WIDE SCSI 80.0 MB/s DT (25 ns, offset 31) >> > Device not ready. >> > target0:0:10: FAST-40 WIDE SCSI 80.0 MB/s DT (25 ns, offset 31) >> > Device not ready. >> > sdc : READ CAPACITY failed. >> > sdc : status=1, message=00, host=0, driver=08 >> > sd: Current: sense key=0x0 >> > ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0 > > Is coming from the disk not the symbios driver ... I think you have a > disk failure. Howcome it works on all mainline kernels, and not -mm then? ;-) Did we fix an error path to detect failures, maybe? M.