From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792896402; b=5i28k5L9rV96Lg5rN02b3VGVshC/bRUCZRqKTqu2msAMv2lKYxYf/1l7jz76EqVXZQxT dO/RakXbD2H+BWEHzh+Mx5KP+ur7wjyGSYJVSPxMxyv8Qa9UqcolfU5GkKEfiLe1D1Nkr atSLMjLOLFxC90z7yWUqrRxNJ2agYrY2kofp1IxzP3ry113bpGgRlLPeEMI56d3tgQkCI 1tcWdOi+QGScXDJqLmKoz0BwJIKgOur/W4v/Gd/Ly7F7pVVbclMqFzkKmfkcQH1V21qpo 7CbaazHxES7YmL9hLVnG4JYt6MhvwARfWs1tpn83Bol+X4oj2cczVeRsJfgYMLUlv2Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792896402; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=m51RTbqXi6UcIYEEn2oSWec0LQle1Gzwzd47Mx7KGJdfpmRl3vEq8h1OZwRCuwKfkoEL xFCQvEKNrSy00wTSYsrOOrXOczPNU40bRDJ/inGhHvt9l0wTUTjbWZLVMxjpQ0Y+eGJps vTKcehpoZi8VJyM+v3z3KgiyBTATGr+Of6YwxDLHHpDyv5fj7CvGS/4DZLviTg6ZBgnt2 Nhbl+nlt0HurSGybJI8kNo/IFfuKv+pXfePHk3LdELJpKuLXIk6Ygu+hiFkObfQ0C/sXc JqJ723Nz8AfkqZ1ZFCBQ5Y6INFVXaxgL/KWW1R1iR5+5lmQKWOOohkWlc9Brz0IhamQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=JAjRh5AM; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD086606A31A; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=JAjRh5AM Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF4A71F01825; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:46:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792896401; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=JAjRh5AMSNdJc+ZRP9xigtKjUF1yLP54itCBL2szlO0JxUtmCdX/85BImJ+laSTat /JoWD+bOo83RPLDpecvd7sVnFPuDLwUI+7JmJfGU8oMlG5H8UCzqxHkb1MDVbFKxlG LsutyKn8ghcKlbY1oBlJ7zGuj7tvdirSxAh9wTLMdjYVeDWEj5fjWSumKKkR/lTvsh v0HeIHSI+Ondad0cD9jPzFvwaWincnG0+CwAopQcw1z7QnMCkMW/mLVjNYxPp/D1tp FQE1/9eCKm5nPizueWvNYfNWYhTenSmxUrZJaS3TveDAYXGnqxeNMYLAN4pAldROIe VMAannvt1bROw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: David Yang Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: motorcomm: Report error when FDB fails to add Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:46:40 +0000 Message-ID: <179289640033.3327.16079802308694610287@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261025024114.1955782-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com> References: <20261025024114.1955782-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.