From: Joas Antonio dos Santos <joasantonio108@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
Cc: Matt Johnston <matt@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Guikun Yang <yangguikun19@qq.com>,
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mctp: free reassembly head skb when key_add fails on SOM
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 09:22:13 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179301733329.91976.14585535037608378942@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <426ef7428413b8d05b6cc3ac22e24b1927ab5aca.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Hi Jeremy,
> [merging two threads here; Guikin reported the same issue, around 12
> hours earlier]
Thanks, I hadn't seen Guikun's report. If a v2 is wanted I'll add:
Reported-by: Guikun Yang <yangguikun19@qq.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_43A65D51143E18518EA968DF9323694EFD08@qq.com/
> We could just defer setting skb to NULL until the mctp_key_add() has
> succeeded; there's already the common error path that cleans up any
> remaining skb.
I think that one needs care. For the first fragment, mctp_frag_queue()
stores skb_unclone_full(skb) in key->reasm_head, and if skb is a clone,
skb_unclone_full() frees it and returns a copy. The kfree_skb(skb) at
out: would then free the original a second time, and the copy in
reasm_head would still leak. Taking skb back from key->reasm_head on
failure would work, but the explicit free looked simpler to me.
> Alternatively, we could change the semantics mctp_key_unref() to also
> free any pending reassembly, but I'm okay with the current approach of
> being explicit about the state handling.
Then I'll keep it as is. Let me know if you want a v2 with the tags
above.
Thanks,
Joas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 22:04 Joas Antonio dos Santos
2026-10-26 7:12 ` Jeremy Kerr
2026-10-26 12:22 ` Joas Antonio dos Santos [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179301733329.91976.14585535037608378942@gmail.com \
--to=joasantonio108@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yangguikun19@qq.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®