From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793260228; b=3ozcLG8id5ijCKRLwxya5hvNPoljd67cMEBa38uxjEwZnm+mM52YuzigvBl517tGDnSL LSNwIhLH77yeAjSuPB5CZJo+xGhcswT+MskykVaQIFlFv81mG7GzwIRqpgoQeDbgz//cS Wv/5dTNX7zsvdwgJGVrsYt0k6tlZY+n8aT9RbOn7PlweRW+g24dUExRRbLNTsOGNHs7p7 mUCXl8znsqt4hg2zH290e/A3S6rMipGj7DILnzU9i6Ei62oF5VZH/hIY9CcYv83mqM3Jt Ed5KLRMbIfR/ja2rOiRMlpxqCFyvAU1x2e7oGQpue+nq2kXUs6J7PQPRHjGZileQwFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793260228; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=LPA6Inh2wBCKqBtP/pIYKJnpKzD87TCTJsmoxrtXeEE=; b=bUc0nnziBfjX8xrP9iwn3hO2Do0TWUVb7RgI4YY5nObc2IRRRXthisshXEl5tcAEJ45j EXCFbIulhX9y+OdQ9qBjIg6/H/YZG1zAj+wJePMXIaRAc6nUiSxSXEv3OeuepE17zkeF1 m38aMETRwgocQikArHnXKVCZm8lU3vFFvJqKA+SGd1AXR61CyxYvzX+2IM9F8al2Dd96x AYIHY+RSupLSgTAFb77ivbJ8eI8a8iVGnFe+RicHzV5qcN/vwdWkBp/eflix1EMH37X3F 7fgdyEhmoKNKtwmNOf/R7FMW7xgU68eUNY1K/l/xh7lb/PIYI4dMz0C79yJ+lR5w6JA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=JQvhmNNG; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6818606A31F; Thu, 29 Oct 2026 07:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=JQvhmNNG Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28E621F01829; Thu, 29 Oct 2026 07:50:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793260227; bh=LPA6Inh2wBCKqBtP/pIYKJnpKzD87TCTJsmoxrtXeEE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=JQvhmNNGK36sulpbupSyeQgY1/i9+fLhfKPjqtpZZHmSjQ6BrwcE1Rp2Q31WIMrdh +tOMZmch+mgXAAcdaT63O8teV+ztS4p1KYAJYGFBC/o4g2DEhXk3OlGKODjrStmicC XOw5tO48cUIZx0ZLluprc/5kYSX5cT/103G4V0aaodLKtR/zNV9KcOcw0RA+OPoYtg 6iri4zFlKtKKdZMfv85qI8qlfR+mNaQN5I03QXKsbSyODaaWUA9IpcdsRj0reUT5hX 7AYWS02SjiNrytftHzf+psdPT6FdfWic4byezbTyrLtZlxjbkCqkUkYm8pTMZvL7vH wCRnVGvFvWpKg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: vmukunda Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Sunil Goutham , Ratheesh Kannoth , Geetha sowjanya , Subbaraya Sundeep , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Naveen Mamindlapalli Subject: Re: [PATCH] octeontx2-af: fix TX hang after link mode change under traffic Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 07:50:26 +0000 Message-ID: <179326022661.3327.15804422690861412603@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261029074635.4139111-1-vmukunda@marvell.com> References: <20261029074635.4139111-1-vmukunda@marvell.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.