From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793267793; b=asjVNcYfH99fDwXKRchZ4Y0W1LJU9UK8W/QLIhFQriL73+rLKGicCqjOTceFX8QBIbFk rhTDzfS08eDtQDfGskWy0YfOy1tx8EKKUypM7wSoMAemm6bobaQg9d0eLkXUpBH4dHPAX c40Q853PXl5JyEFkRRreC+YJo3Ezt2ZynlApHbeaKFJB5J8crUiYUWopz/QFZdoArf1W5 Bkd0GFfjE1o/d+FIWR8ykKnBW+QA8zbS1eeNY024D6N4z8cvYxLykT9xsrewgwm0PovRj WclWM9VdzvOwTJu+6kPW8p+SiUriDdVl6eDh9A+FuYzL1cmUtLGquljnD5cmGNpC++g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793267793; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=BQ7utKynwQWDrnjHnQU8rInTnbd56jtxZwPJG5lj1AtnFTXANqmNwSlWejryEhbDXN3W Fmo+565h1z+czU5gzU4Sk7numv/y9GgLW4Q5RV3+PfnPePWnfIfDm+T1xbvhDx6DstVpB QrkJtV1MDpZ/qg3t4D9hglqxol8T6rnCRR1C02EAaJj53v7R/gcm3zP5xTqbY+JvBc2dh wrgkvrpLyLBWz6ziGuRK4/JcW4LHbpBCINpUP2szXeY77jRvd4kxjfEXu1PU+BQi9icRE xtuSFS7453dznHRTT+gOODGJ7iymBCI7wkc3scUdkzAO1SuuCfwf9mttCNa9k00pbGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=XVlmbW8U; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1097E606A31F; Thu, 29 Oct 2026 09:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=XVlmbW8U Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03EA11F031E3; Thu, 29 Oct 2026 09:56:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793267792; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=XVlmbW8UihNpNvT/6rh5IRV/88agVTAnNdYmKJH9XSzSvfJj2hY7/cX++uJJmpR7i lescv/ASmjxHLEh8zAo5AwIKdqvimEveMHZrlA/3BbbJrMwOIb0hWZ08MXyJk98Ddb QyWlUAlO6ARwKp+RtIG8rLlgtIlL/wMz8FgjqUBNGwbq0jnKG4LershNDJsKjmqm/D 1ybyonl4x3aUcw4zm1zLzcIF0pMlkaVp2niOaL4aHGYIFgwTUpuLXDSki1wMZXcLVe Fu71xI1zm6I79oYpVYiIMmxmVFffUQ3fWVm95CMTpUfw9rPhsX2v8/Q4+fQIPO8gHh FD+COQWphX3Kw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Coia Prant Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: pcs: xpcs-rk: limit advertised interfaces Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 09:56:31 +0000 Message-ID: <179326779144.3327.11596356628770174944@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261029094916.3127193-2-coiaprant@gmail.com> References: <20261029094916.3127193-2-coiaprant@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.