From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793614789; b=t+dz+OF/4TBFsPLuMCrLHJo0RpxmD8iza8n++UYAzMLCBCFSr2OgcNcwKb1cvWh7ZEFf 94URobkwXN7VA9e3wBQEvheKmMJj0E/h1TXCzktWCUmK9/du/KdH0ApbE68QyEhe/cbhW T7vkkWP4+iwGqzXZA7tSUz5zjwb6QHnuo5erAbOCQ9NBq26XZZInI9JMbnAQnHa7ntI7f lpeErhxhMhrZ5f1gaCQM9ogNMHOgfdwgTHg7Hzb8YIDDXIQsNrvW0BYuXCFmNsZgefs6C UuJHH86fY73a3SSBi/djpjtPp5PY3r7LBfAzpGNm7Mq+bkuSJuN0YkFoY6G65+1v1SQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793614789; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=GyWx9E9Qnj1pRFzhoAZ+4m5P4NVN7Yi1au+ZSe4PpmKKvozaPSAlghNqOH/ipYax8uKu tPDlbRh7P4ObJj2jDZn6M2X+bhQ+4BxxnHs6riBffJm83+TavQlyYxQKJmqLtTmd6IDjH 85JgJE8hCgOYvbhNthQjyEAfAjzFt2UNQyfApYlafh0FC5bVs7xCr+BH8iMtoooe7V8lv OhEv2SECvFz+/hd1CguQvCelQtVNHnvfAG7ADOPGGHVpUBFGHtyaHPBtepg7phO5QuYgG I6P8w2eSz+J9PI7pq3e8eZQ2PO/i7tL8Le6h+03lifoJVd4n6VlStrV/AcauCAo60Aw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=LjfRv+8M; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12413606A326; Mon, 2 Nov 2026 10:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=LjfRv+8M Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 348BC1F000C1; Mon, 2 Nov 2026 10:19:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793614788; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=LjfRv+8Migm9PT38EK1gcUxk5BhUA/yA7IKAheUtasQbmEjvB6k05LSKIcdp40RHL DH34Pam6sIarhXUYEI7mraRPbA94Xur8Aw4lb4NZ6rU0qXgiB4g8xkYvbb1Wd2gCde cnF74c8Hf6NQIaJF2ZjDGKi+Yq2WdwsWXtZKeb1/XTJPgtqn6UuqinaGdWJeX25waj d4f3Bto+ukQy4iUYvNT+IPvJj41O0rNX1Klsh5rqLgaIzrvirn36cZUbkPKCwEQTzx bgWh9J2o4OZkWPzdcZtPLhnORSxIjoTYZ0EjqenOjnY9hvMA9Hei9cPA/wKOoYVIrS 6a3W73zraUdnQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: David Yang Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: motorcomm: Do not publish partial MIB sample Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 10:19:47 +0000 Message-ID: <179361478774.3286.6135052914469846414@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261102101334.3525485-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com> References: <20261102101334.3525485-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.