From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
horatiu.vultur@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sparx5/lan969x: release the in-flight slot of a stale TX skb
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:40:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179363041231.4096563.5352456270164745162.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029-sparx5-ptp-stale-tx-slot-v1-1-ec15f391bbb7@microchip.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2026 12:48:10 +0100 you wrote:
> sparx5_ptp_txtstamp_request() counts every two step TX skb waiting for
> its timestamp in sparx5->ptp_skbs, and refuses new ones once
> SPARX5_MAX_PTP_ID are in flight. sparx5_ptp_txtstamp_old_release()
> frees the skbs that have waited longer than SPARX5_PTP_TIMEOUT.
>
> Before this patch, old_release() does not decrement ptp_skbs, so every
> skb whose timestamp never arrives, for example because the switch
> discarded the frame, keeps its slot forever. Once SPARX5_MAX_PTP_ID
> slots are lost, two step frames fail to transmit on every port of the
> switch.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: sparx5/lan969x: release the in-flight slot of a stale TX skb
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/873363ac591a
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 11:48 Daniel Machon
2026-10-30 22:37 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 9:14 ` Daniel Machon
2026-11-02 11:56 ` Simon Horman
2026-11-02 14:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179363041231.4096563.5352456270164745162.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®