From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793702050; b=S7uc3KXb37HbYFHTCya/dHrVKKAK19TokcEd1pbtYNGpKs4iuwqvEpuIUyj5YB4d/xSo GVCf0nNUOcrq9eMq5OpCXUAKzFf5C8tX+0Fl4I/Q14QSMPYCwUacjrN2SoHpWqRQqOqXI +G82gEwv4B5Hn37096o6Fsi3IwYWVR80F1pVs2iR/3YI3wuNzjDBBCOlTvJdq5/fGCJpt j4wYgBSzTj95xrV/npDTYOd9EpEnSgNC4d3Ravb8yLJeCpwBq6z/x8UwsudjX6uUCYlXz /o/pDr+3FFYY81RC79C3FABNKTLUtkV/38/yKedF1fTUp9MPnAlArLsRW5N1xe3BRGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793702050; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; b=ElZ8i+Cu0H383a4Cnzol7T75WU669apfj8mK5UU8k62NRytrpLaDQHhsADgEtZcJ1Mlu UIL+4zNJ/NH7naa4MpadejRuTqVwi98vZu3H0+OO9aGkQ7e0T6cVcm8ZxuC4cEkxu8QOK lI+HQP07lKadTsxBmTa7lvz98yMUwY38w/9yaM9cdSSOgIa5NW2/oCPSvkXRSFUz9LKs1 illO5+sOcJB+IPTk/8Oh5MzLXJioFoJ4fqAVqIsziV58dqG252nE84VlGxi4/xWYC41H4 Np2nlq2NlwiHDRFeu6eJ4t0f+sr1n7q00cUvZYL+erpI1FwjM1RlA+AVLEmBR1jh0RQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=cZObSSxO; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A672D606C5B9; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=cZObSSxO Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7F5B1F000C1; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:34:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793702050; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=cZObSSxOSZQWmBulA5loTfX+tXhZMEE3HncvIzlvUELgjg69OvaLJOT7AoP1OItI8 Mq0pPNt8NXUQiGF1X4dloCUIfVDBRpM0yJPv3TrpsrGTyNlRrfM3DmYMwxbuhUVk+I sg1CyNHXpRMlMw1I1hasm+pJwRtyWEbK9yPVJ9VqjQoW+nqtc67v5eyEPYVrikuZEn y2NhwrRWrrsH49yz2geNCfw/FkrmRehaYs5lKFAkDGyhT31OLs85hy2eNC516B+pYp oKIm0Z0ueZGsFBUBxdc+ToPRBaNZHNPKoNzIPWAQbhy3inLRkcIwPHjVi+BmAsr8yN Zaih7I7HPPjUA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Wentao Liang Cc: Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: disable the PCI device when resume fails Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 10:34:09 +0000 Message-ID: <179370204942.488859.12490720807858636370@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261103102849.1340413-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> References: <20261103102849.1340413-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.