From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793702121; b=jXsOzG6LMxcRmYZKjdRDropZgv8/BMPJH47rGoKWWWEMexfkDBRSny43+YjkG+i88N60 lVqoRK8rnGprmhyhNgHIi+OQMoVGKbGUeQCVaz4aqxNT0G18kKbHRJO4OdHcNT7QP8wVw p0sdCs44XBtgl3EttxOSLyH1W8+fUrBzYON295xvlehC1Pf4Vqpxl9Rq0yEBvVIso4zCu wAYEfoad4lm9CUzcYm6hXGNjG5IR5nQUoRGOl+z8TckKX6SzYW2pSrqyz2JVgs/NpddnB AVjmadH/1cNUbJneTe2vwrJ0OGlFde6T3tdimu0SCp2+sZJUEz+rAhOLCor5kNTPQhg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793702121; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; b=g8CXpm9jfE2f7+zLnB5alzNip53AFfXKgOGLuYU8GixIvg+26runSjV3ZUiHRouBjjVr H01wQ7Nlc/Xvct3S7Dvz82cj9vzoxsa7VU+6tL99nev7ptYI0jY7Xl49fq5lJJ9IQvL84 qdZGK/VY6AO5d43XZyDE6IxRFdvf2ye8MDcEPALzG+k5WDoSjtheCQxlcPWEnFhK2q/mK r0k91fGjXHhdD1cOaJxPfAkmPcXV5aB/du1TjZMqOPHahCFk1yp7kBcaLy/OaM4uxAbn3 9YuvyBvO4Yo8a1HjlbL+o6PoGIpJPTsZhi+IuKCnG06GvrSf+rqKF0tT50o6imLhVMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=amasMzCr; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6003A6070AA3; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=amasMzCr Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F5D21F000C1; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:35:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793702120; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=amasMzCrNeNDN/3vk+4l64FRtVd0KZykcnKoiwcNC1Fm15kyBrVy2PH29l1DV81WM 3czvT95T+4jQXNzzdO7h8gptwQAzkgE155J/QKar9R/thfy989XJeBvHoZx4bmBh9W lIDv0c7W8X3NtnYIbOdi2xgBY3ANdQmjh5ubIPVUVfTDRISwXy5+XlbmqUbPsrv1xf fyEEJaCtjd63XJajtfX2gZnbNp2qG/htklQMeeEvtNE29amaB2N+0MvpFOcIBBH5IM MkV2jwZqTw1IRV1dF92v7sihAIRm7bknrjBV7iNiQEKFeJOSXotp/SayMuAK7b1eFe VSk3OqwWaECHQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Wentao Liang Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: drop the refclk mux node reference Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 10:35:20 +0000 Message-ID: <179370212002.488859.1362537216158287231@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261103102913.1341095-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> References: <20261103102913.1341095-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.