From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793818427; b=ngg49r7rQQAPiLSjPCWSAD3He0V2NvgbBDy+VWI2C5sf5S36VVBXiMBCtlf7CgJEi/z6 DauRRK43qR2LVQqxIK6JvBjPv6umxRKP6dwi2m84Zg8GlawM6uw4uRyW+0oDxQugH227/ eHnJaGPVp09xUakP6XI8OVLwkrhzP47M4jD6T1V2K2c51DgssPaoeBggLL5nej3UHk33k XGMVsPibZXcmh9BBUa2SP1Xlqs+xE3QMw/TFVAwxajsnaIl1fkhDUzDKmWvnnAZSEn+hD 7OCJnlzbR4xnlwU7/9M9+r4gHWC0vLwvtFB/nDg0a2IVqvh1pOJ7LLIUf8sgclkuUnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793818427; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; b=l7RPkmFgH3sEPSTQxX9NpZBFdmxa4whqio0R3eebRBh4m4AnK5goDjO9MAdo45qPWOIC vlS9mTJPBJEvIm9MttLxsh5+Y7A/yV9MUtlBr1seGQDKVxZz+17uBLKlTJ9iLM0vXfb6S zkPqbvqgkdUZw6ZXwckejQJbkUNpMvyfbci3XgnxFVIKRlVUBPeurAjzo8V9VPagLv8mb uCOiPMAHHY5JRjYRpZRVwwpmtZdmZJi8AmizD9PQc/eKm9NAJ9CKEvwH9/p7LKeF1qNEa hI9vLmuNx6ZBLwcOtofBizel1rjfcpFmuvqeDKyZDcz+nUIhyolbjc0qb6BgJSuwAHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=eXCvFuDU; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B9C606A330; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 18:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=eXCvFuDU Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2A721F000C1; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 18:53:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793818426; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=eXCvFuDUA5RNtyc/tcg5n5mfR4ya7s4aCqBXwm/WLftspUNTI7WpiyHUk/ojFTbeH C522E53qNf++5aiP9nwFo6L0aYLjujRjpi5Fy1D1crIuU1k44FBWwiaKdpTflD2i9Y 6cOFJZ6WXymiJ4/+cRgJ1NGDYR7tEA7E5ZCR+oMyga4kZLzblMcy25qcw03yOqyIx8 1IuJVpFfYo5ek/Nq7OSIQwdTLWw2iKHF16TLosoiCWfwNE9UmmvUyzIZ5pV9YEWKTE ECLxueLk4dsNjCndFdU4KZ6KqgzzMSEf3uAmZ2h1vDZ0RCPXYG5dnBjISElVswmCgr ZEI6M9eHlJrTg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: James Hilliard Cc: Maxime Chevallier , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Piotr Wejman , Russell King , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: stmmac: rebuild VLAN priority steering when filters change Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 18:53:45 +0000 Message-ID: <179381842538.488859.11490770653999769834@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261104-submit-stmmac-vlan-prio-v1-v2-1-6cfc71e636ad@gmail.com> References: <20261104-submit-stmmac-vlan-prio-v1-v2-1-6cfc71e636ad@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.