From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Timur Stukan <timur.stukan.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hangbin.liu@linux.dev,
razor@blackwall.org, fmancera@suse.de, jv@jvosburgh.net,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] bonding: fix missing down path on speed/duplex failure after FAIL->UP
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 11:00:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179387640882.3593676.11672441638791431727.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101150240.66292-1-timur.stukan.linux@gmail.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2026 17:02:39 +0200 you wrote:
> In bond_miimon_commit(), when a slave is proposed as BOND_LINK_UP but
> bond_update_speed_duplex() fails in bonding mode that needs speed/duplex
> (802.3ad, tlb, alb), the slave is set to BOND_LINK_DOWN directly. This
> bypasses bond_set_slave_link_state(), bond_miimon_link_change() and
> failover.
>
> This is fine for slave that coming from BOND_LINK_BACK, which was never
> brought up and is not in use. But since commit 1899bb325149 ("bonding:
> fix state transition issue in link monitoring") the commit phase also
> handles BOND_LINK_FAIL -> BOND_LINK_UP which means a slave that is still
> in use and may be curr_active_slave.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v3] bonding: fix missing down path on speed/duplex failure after FAIL->UP
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/a76ab5e733b4
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 15:02 Timur Stukan
2026-11-01 15:08 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-03 13:22 ` Timur Stukan
2026-11-05 6:43 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-11-05 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179387640882.3593676.11672441638791431727.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=timur.stukan.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®