From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793969521; b=mR8ftTcATpbLwfThIfPh7+YgLDIa5seLkFnbGVizkas4F4rfdLORjNFGW/ZvZNTvAGys RhPi44AAK3lXoEZX1aB1UHIIBJ/JkHY/l1IFuchABf+oBRAa1kYYEJXWclp50ni7MUZyv E93g2wZB5OMTPpVzEj1eE6fN98M98yoM0sQOzh9f4GKi8+m6A8LcweFkNGSxZXrkaGuuh KZlWGWOi5js8MiYC5UrLut8k5FVYdavhdPe/yEWvCtusQgo0CQe6HYajXMxloRIqETYl3 OOkNGPTXZEB7rdcF0hfj0ohfhKLxZ7A++2nRQt9bgSheiU48VrmgCzcy2sA2oU7Jppg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793969521; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=UojQJjLQNvXk+5B0a+UP65mEhQAd42ztdOq8LyS7tRjUGNqsEOz4JyjMRsdXgO19pV9Z vwFNwdcG2yKYjkbwTzJYcyAWmFi1UwCyNy0zlEtQKSfrN30Xe3aDqTZWF88cZS3x/ca5/ z4paz0ceCBRWzOEkH5XAqvW7odtHYbA+1FpVTo+GPRrElsF/l6JZN9unqKDFLm8JoVLGX rSTRrqCzos7KZp9uuJksBtXXQ0cxZM0AbdL4vweOtaisMyPFMbIwEn6IUvwCEr9jIhEP9 fplvwF0QOU6NtRy3uX8/lpGRqJVi/JsdFMdZlNaVSoQ9fQ3lWM5XBUgUsPCKzuejmNQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=dNkB8maR; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF5F606A329; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 12:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=dNkB8maR Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 941B11F008A7; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 12:51:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793969520; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=dNkB8maRDD5sk7+SeIaDMFRc9m/oHDU4QWywBPH22fiCxajQXRBdsQdsQTcZ9Mz5U ZTrjREREOoNX3Y7Fmb1rZRcMmbK+H9iOCxwwr2CKoc9lo4kCHsbo6mYM1RdAfEv+k1 8VNmZgxu3/D+QO6kcJCogKJh4C7/nlWpeQt3wICkWSFUs5O58qidKReCxBTw1oUVLJ 11ER189MKk4N8tFUzOPEelSWHvCqP4XXi0RmRQXZlDEgJTu7PrXcNnasjR+l9hQUo1 +K8Ah1wbHVdU2s00NPG6Ejww4AkxidWnOskryDuNTDhwBN02lNqLD+d1fn2oGNZp4C 6D/M8jDYo1FdA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Hungyu Lin Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, n05ec@lzu.edu.cn, ylong030@ucr.edu, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sashiko-bot@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vlan: prevent cross-netns MII register writes Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 12:51:59 +0000 Message-ID: <179396951913.488859.6939446723200882827@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261106124639.12584-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com> References: <20261106124639.12584-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.