From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793973721; b=ke3A/wEkEli+vUFuEm+MJozLXIo6nzwN4Q0ikV+dZGbG4RHXB/nOgTRs/Mosu+IP8tDc if8gNt4u14sCDi5FLYmsnexNW1Uw9lt0XT9TeHLSIOeSjkzMRNKR2qDbAFF9hWj5dum6o cYumYXnJXYBRzLgfwupuQtHCyleRVrQ5Z8HNEHsqHrCWsLfoqoJ3Or2jVWGGmgVYsnZQ9 Z4W8fEv/7fTC6M6Uypt34UyAdEJGpINDRIED5gYyEaZabtWqSwog9F2Io+C+sBm5l8bBT Tdt4FVQ5EkARO1DFrnGkZ4fR5zH9XlCP86sBbq+0rqpqhR/8CJrX/Ir/TIdTEIzjxfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793973721; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; b=OwRufSi6ohCEqNQ/Pc7Rdpn8PEyFj9kTp0A+0bVzM4qyb66qZrTD6Azx5zPOlLegfAHQ bozX2arZ39gm+nlCicKYou6H50Ttb7KwcDJ3fBHP0ffsSDyea4p+BowHZ6dSOlHOYMOqG dW7qbcYWkILU9uuKffINwMji/OM91tbVRRrs5r73QMxvqRvY3NHa7uH6EOSlwIuznFkH6 xJFOxQi8xHK9JTX0pJ7OfykjCxOdjd3mq8U0Bj8rhsOc1mRoC2IldKOHyYKFASZDyHQfi yG98vcJSnXSwVsTlWQgcVAmKffIb+5yTel8EqUga4w0hiwjgSJEb/L1lYMNUadmpw6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=WQfAHEo4; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31719606D80F; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 14:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=WQfAHEo4 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18F221F008A3; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 14:02:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793973721; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=WQfAHEo4M6MIAVKfypgwDG3FeiCi0B0JFTj+PFvpFL3uPtrAymJ5IeeAhxCFW0Cfy 1gUAmAUZJQ7XhNaDso3bcsF5q0hsGLqIVpiWd1j+wr5AXky4IhlQgs56CH27YS9QF2 gjTzVBfkzL82Lm9v00y5VE4BMHzJjpHqAOu7dhHkItRICk/DGDVa+Lt16f/I0pmEOo Zsk1yRlWuINrf/r7m7RZuL5zWUjKbwT50fqCnowGCipZP8kBBxmIukjM1+UyDnKVY0 BIHMVU0hVssrLHoIDh6NZi9KQulDB7elRYO+BKQzt63COelUlXkgGM9kMCKqbVVSFe IZKH1CvzEv+yA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Lin Jiapeng Cc: Eric Dumazet , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Paolo Abeni , Willem de Bruijn , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Simon Horman , Martin KaFai Lau , Daniel Borkmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, TencentOS Corvus AI , stable@vger.kernel.org, Lin Jiapeng Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: reuseport: avoid duplicate closed socket insertion Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 14:01:59 +0000 Message-ID: <179397371960.488859.17332481477084448537@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261106135841.418-1-ljp1205831794@gmail.com> References: <20261106135841.418-1-ljp1205831794@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.