From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794165409; b=QEqXlP0FbvpO6n97jjW+0kxH/IUxXTAQkCQRQJz/gnDTnJxqzjmpXm6tXN9QpBR13PDD xUfPyjQjO2WQwlCopBQomBD4pLJgB0bpj0YPBSZB2WBPv7zcFH3K5ysdy55qpXhVSoetx 9wVHIUDZ67vieVA5XED05Vs7TdLiMUlQBNAEpADMNVE8Eg0d7vPDICJMb6SZZ6adNJXTB 0YWGan752sThI8+snjI2aMoqhnztjsFdHq8z6eKRH+N45enmuh0nbfCr3rfPD+LgDx8j+ 5UlSKRzKKnyWXlr9k5cSv2NXcmAnjte6Uo9bjDEZAzhikwabncAqfk1MOFwXJJp832w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794165409; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=RU0VW8puxko1VgPUXuZDHjicgX85Ou/sztsF0NyqWMe5gQ97KPFnxEM4GIhhKAkN9Qhn nUjLYC4uKp7vReOds9I2BLYp4JpWkK/PIqMywK8jbMod0V6tGHvl5PWcHsIEbGnc/a76C 3aKdxp9yvtRUKKT6aM6V1+eVRxyN8fFNznhjtB/1yYvZleAUI20Qy87V/nWPyup+GvrCU BFzG/2fC249s+eHIn2sv1AltieyFhDAQw+FBH9wu64fCHd1J62yJZelYFMWtXFkSm1s+6 Y7Sf3pRIC2iWv08vWGiBt0rmTQM9Yt8lAPA/T6VaGSV0dwhkROaIWQsBzoIVfL6R50w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=PEGtXwVg; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8ACA606A31C; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 19:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=PEGtXwVg Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA1651F0089F; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 19:16:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794165408; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=PEGtXwVg5cj2Dfz0QfESHU3AAZmsbnE5nnxPy82r+VzItvHKR0YtDC9n97TuavStY kOZHHzVJD/XbVgvNpWDaK0mJPdBQS1Qtf6nHTMz+0EYzrSy7mzVDnC1qrjik/fs0S7 LAjytQDcvhrnPei28FhoyiQYgqTj5OKOpHBZMSxB4Cr4+3Nee5ikZ+4HdcZoEVIcYe 4M/APL4RndAf5sUaaquiZIGsavQ1ptV4MwMAkaunIr8vfGJlQnm8PiTfu0X3bmMN/5 NlzGq9Wm7H8Uji5C0DRMkDyVLf3GRzheUMtR1N7dhD8qtRGsG6JGnl1aYV1TCL+vF5 /PrSFwkpuXDyA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Ofri Zangi Cc: John Fastabend , Jakub Kicinski , Sabrina Dubroca , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Vakul Garg , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guy Tzalik Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tls: fix async encryption race on weakly ordered architectures Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2026 19:16:47 +0000 Message-ID: <179416540733.488859.2191045262399137766@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261108-tls-async-tx-ordering-v1-1-f9a1844ca88e@xsightlabs.com> References: <20261108-tls-async-tx-ordering-v1-1-f9a1844ca88e@xsightlabs.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.