mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaosheng Qu <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
To: Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl>,
	Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v8 0/4] can: j1939: fix the abort timer and bound EDPO
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 15:20:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1794300100.11111.1000000@163.com> (raw)

v8 addresses the three findings from the sashiko review of v7.

1/4 is rewritten.  The v7 version cancelled the receive timer before
taking active_session_list_lock and started it again under the lock, so
two concurrent callers could both reach hrtimer_start(): the second one
reprograms an already armed timer and the reference taken for the first
arm is never dropped, leaking the session and its netdev reference.  The
new j1939_tp_arm_rxtimer_locked() uses hrtimer_try_to_cancel(), which
never waits for a running callback, so the cancel and the start happen
together under the lock.  j1939_tp_set_rxtimeout() and the rx timeout
branch of j1939_tp_rxtimer() use the same helper, so there is one arming
path instead of three.

2/4 now calls j1939_session_timers_cancel() before aborting on an
out-of-range EDPO, as the other receive-path abort handlers do.
j1939_session_cancel() only rearms the abort timer, so the transmit timer
stayed armed on an aborting session: on the transmitter path the retries
kept firing until J1939_XTP_TX_RETRY_LIMIT and overwrote session->err with
-ENETUNREACH, on the receiver path they sent CTS or EOMA and clobbered the
abort timeout.  It also carries the Fixes tag for the NULL dereference.

3/4 and 4/4 are unchanged from v7.


Chaosheng Qu (4):
  can: j1939: serialize cancel and rearm of the receive timer
  can: j1939: validate the EDPO packet number
  can: j1939: drop the message when the reassembled skb is gone
  can: j1939: reject a CTS that names more packets than the message has

 net/can/j1939/transport.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0



                 reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1794300100.11111.1000000@163.com \
    --to=quchaosheng000406@163.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robin@protonic.nl \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®