From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794310000; b=HpHkb5ZGfwUiz8fqhV2wB2C2Qo5aYipozcffAMXRP/EJgit4273mjh8RhMssi9p0Yo2P 3YegOMh/7kViWoeq68j3UAVVP9MOX0OZaktBMa88xJ6iOPK+v3PW3XHwyOmcLt7AL1Vfj NpBl47ZIEBmQi+hd2I35vuL6rVSJmQAIbYYxukgyjDWl8CA4X1rq/p44LtokOElxZ53Q2 y+Ybwx3P4gdTAjXGNvHol5Sns5X7wtBfuqF4k8U94zF/8yUnv6T/aJVP0kUudwTYwW4K6 EwDcIWIDN6M0LbjROwTpS4gbyY/i7dArK7mI9xabTSij8fLiYfCnjRSoUVUi3dGmaVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794310000; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=vCplkEWe36X7Q1at0765rb874dESe2NZ6O5FAdQ985njMUP++uHU5/KhhUDpivdkdPKh p46gLC4WqVlt4/SOaX6lGCMwCbxUb0gAsiVmcuRva5CN9iDk0KJySOYenIsKyBmpEVb4i GuUKH9QpObVlSBB2WRl3ksgP35Ftra8TANF7Y9oFlTJ2oc01QzvlChSQZhMgGEnyOpgMb C3DxURK8su83zarwwF2CKhs2/HTUxtmoM5qzAUCnIrkUUjQLaDKtvJql07/2TLhm0BFmC qTV7h92v+b4qZwBz/W5OF2QoXoFnWWNAPtdkmV885furtWyh0lg6hCU5KiQ428e/hyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=UsKF8Llt; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B71606A331; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=UsKF8Llt Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B18351F008A3; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:26:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794310000; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=UsKF8Llt4xkylbIUT46g7idN097o5jJoRSy2GgM/dvX7GrZPaR6Cyg1jULldTwOn4 3Xdcey3ib0cL6M+Kee6q+mFpNQLSI23Nn+lyjRrZrH8ER+KtxhWQfeZ2mvpe/7jZ4S nd71XOFw5rohMdLNaJjxD2BKMBQlYFbXKSskN1XI1MaJIvgduPJtCKCfTE5LfHY64e eCRcCQCZ1wmKbb8/S6eTEEiJjMC4gEDkv/PeEtRghg7cNgs3FWonfI5cJ88qYjFu50 2lTdKRqfh8lIfl1PJE8Nqqx9hNe8r0h2oOLH3DztOMj2c105MyrZWof+Ikj8ANkmXG uBINLtzNRmMeg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Alex Markuze Cc: "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] net: streamline skb_splice_from_iter() Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:26:39 +0000 Message-ID: <179430999926.488859.4270273148397539600@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261110112325.3263078-1-amarkuze@redhat.com> References: <20261110112325.3263078-1-amarkuze@redhat.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.