From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794310597; b=4QgfuukV+PCFyYDu3Tv7jyI5DSGFjGOadMVestLWyuDK6JnwBW9Q0lgROvMvy/REQA4U 7Q/fFazDUxM1O/UVBytQ8sei3ZBJbVmZbnXoQDBcMBL/YWBr+n0Cu4gmS6lTyBVidrHj0 M2lS1KvPCe2IbiNzjkbsGM1iPQml7LsV9X/mP7CV5irJLzFTMFXd2sa3xI4swpvdFE7Xf tVDMipnmAdeMpjA96J5JM6JnmFxgzrZRVJCGGfDJrsZ9bWUnUfEjl4ISdKPkl7aEbmUhQ DFq3Oi1Bixmc8TtvQ/hDm8E/1cElqwikEgs3L7eqH8vbJpd6f5mVSGlD/xceH5o+xbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794310597; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=BFBEnLC14bvpPsgy9OWSYCyQKbLU+Gyk3BH6g2EK9Es60Tpi48WuCuai3mSZjV1TiMlU wZaknsWN11C/AnXUOJJ1ScOWk6fcRPI6JfmWkJ/FRWjbr8TPGi3Bk9yeKDfFU0dbqcE5S PEnNw7WeSaQYf55AlPaOpk2eCc4s30O/cF8vTmv/xB7ShZxj40Y08Ga+ot+nbFlULvG11 eFOJHDreZbkdRaoI8yHiGtxklFs6SG9QW9y+9r/s1N48YEW3KkGONA/K+6NDH2TEV9P5p mXZbJVrKbhnzQ34vjgBtYUH0WlUaTISO9uZnXb87xr4M7gK3l1WAW09Yls7FihWRVWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="bJ//RS/D"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59F4606A31C; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=bJ//RS/D Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7ADD1F0089F; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:36:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794310596; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=bJ//RS/D2zUscZrOpd/lAqGqEZ6/Ya3Jaya6m1wN/Mzg08eYuJyHbCTG/PLHNr7k7 7KLJU7Y+NF80+Q3tx6fmHhZA9BkDxHEmutN/wPGdf+4gHJ1F0fx9GopZWQcLcGEc3K kiy7CdLer2EZaxx3Dsz/1plzAtFVrgJjkc26SHmuT2S85U9LwcrpLh2owORNc6Fftl Glxo8IByU736QUZ8+skrnzExUC260D6xZEq0Er3zHBkA3omAR2TDVozLFhVqNn2TgC XbBak1+mG7ZXxWfLxJ8o9hIgkT7Vm54C/mo5NzhBPQ5fx5g5tMNaWJ1lmRrCuG6+NK GN11tIXj9j2kQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Willem de Bruijn , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Alice Mikityanska , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] udp_tunnel: don't treat IPv4 sockets bound to an address as wildcard Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:36:35 +0000 Message-ID: <179431059548.488859.9340944150774199097@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261110113306.3698438-1-antonio@mandelbit.com> References: <20261110113306.3698438-1-antonio@mandelbit.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.