From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794311202; b=hjJRcZnwx5DGS69tLCz4ZsGYV6qJNsC5EgkMQ+FJsrCp4zldw0lAIEPzhnJrQOa0nA8R XOFAZ+0tz3DrrUUd+lpnmjI3pxznsHIHnI+Ool43dY2NkIy5H14+0tX4yB104VBEWDeWm 2wbu2hD9NCsSbT+KncdXWFE+/4PbppwnweRmaO98kwToONJ021W/7jNDhY548HEuNyJHF YW3Phv3kq4ZBgyZ3UVVVsTgTqVaYjhRSM+w0EqHfoYCYkeKhwPbSkH7FfI4emMvqsFURn XvFgtT0TX9Gfg4qiSJblhcAQNlw01SGV8koaLwouRScTX37dwd+lVoXUuKYbOnAAWJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794311202; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; b=uA/Ykyelojlat/QvdmQuBXpEKg9wz5UFkSC72kwnPIbVlGncCXcyOTvHLazftBU6sY15 NaZktU9mR6wP7gVNqmpXwVifwiKspD3Lfxk/ph/yLFCr2CyLFZ2lh7rWVBicCRQwrN6ZR ALPcEAkH9X6Xs+ecAD92iESVhx0uWsaVdpPaTuae8HQaEHDcf1BslEqcn6PT8EHZcJx1R NtZZCmVJ4huVlZ2/30C+uckB7Fg9k0dzR7NOT+uaAD+Lo4PRU0QEMWbcEiD4j6yWo8667 V+t/HkvoOC+Ojs0SQady+FCdAjizJLvyEzYL042L5mLjlNVzXP4Ch4+dK50sLeIdlCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=LFSFFYkp; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EE5E60A260F; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=LFSFFYkp Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21FCD1F0089F; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:46:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794311202; bh=80POjU5WP6ctS0DqN7hA/63JAQ8Agh1hTny2C1kJcvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=LFSFFYkpXH7uqQz46Yj46dzkAyO1t1Qyu1DXOZBeodOMBYJyIXJA81p0LqBIV9WAz CWAhLuLD0Srhq1UJUpLIouTOhfL0/kJ/WvmDqI6PB7qnGLGcVFX9psdV/Sm47IVdgX YPxF+/oJoXwhTUdxzmCkJZycAwUvGcS6G5jL8/s8Y3juDbsFv1dxUCljfgRBLUWZQU opIbBHwEHC9Le9wzm1r/B1ZOAicV8zjLAGluUQDdqZ/W95JTi13wm51V72KRqoXFzr KAdNUmfEKBtksWe+Ana6HUCX7f8sG72i5vSvGi7nyoQnYajq1sUD/R69VXeQMReVxR 2LFx8FUSDdoVg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Tariq Toukan Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Gal Pressman , Leon Romanovsky , open list , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Maor Dickman , Mark Bloch , Moshe Shemesh , Or Har-Toov , Roi Dayan , Saeed Mahameed , Shay Drori , Uri Dar Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Lag, Return error when enabling MPESW without LAG support Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:46:40 +0000 Message-ID: <179431120058.488859.15105288685934653677@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261110114350.2639891-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20261110114350.2639891-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.