From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794357384; b=w2iaJoKnvZ8sDEjwVpFTq94hVnkWxhwaFSdxTUsuzjTsd1+uUwbkgkPf6aw4mJgOWJ0f mHxOqVe73zonIX+X/ai74RW3DZ92iTqEs2nFM/jGsHxuW/DKJcoDEPfMcqJ4TJJz6LxW0 2bHQAADmB4m6lGJFPK5Pl+3LYt5pGQ2qusID4Yik/JdIH4ukDSEdVlpX7BvSZZv1B0fM1 Yr6xF3aMMDhhSxe4tHI3FCUynz6lN+GgxBTEmTQgUTJ7f4J50Sxd+Xjc95rq56jzTT0Rn EZOxHvCSYhv5MM8ggb13Jsi5RutDGn9BoanQ7kSY986EhVD2S34QWxfDZ41TVy/Njqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794357384; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; b=0gM0NlP2HWUTUiqNTcf95nrw1Fv6KqCNUkN8itBiM9vcShNNBv4tKVZVuHm2ToSfdZQx tbsPeJlW4yCnYyt754RydIoSnLiJfAesCOn0smi//QtVmNQ/qMBye2Is915943PpD3wcR vjqz0tCnWZX0lWRUHECWo8aJVPfPl1+uzySD7i0yghsY3kV6TAUkTPRBhYDKtXYyVchxN ZM3pVUaWN4d5zq39vw5kWT1ISTDcJQscZ8Hcdofi0JGnsTIrmR/3kJ3RajL0NdjSlp0h/ Lrd25EAD7NGPkQMs3Ef3scsuXO6OkSsxSN5GZ24c8wnwhxiRQuFjhcQtGMamgCiWGDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=UbF4OK5k; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A34606A320; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 00:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=UbF4OK5k Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 777381F0089F; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 00:36:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794357383; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=UbF4OK5kNcGoYNpstlu81e6BgvOXffr820N19Fup9mMrcYIfQgRXPZJPAUzozhSKu hvD84qbPYxXj4zXHdRUiFkk/rnmxjXuR+ShuEgmYBf8feIeVdZQpbv9U5d0LD6ORrV qWr7eIXPwqVA6ilU8iia9wFyPSYpAWO1Pz212Ub2UyL0R9Q1JuToZHB/6l8h3CH4ed oFPItDRhGMPWP0GIkTiHjsX7NFG9ShdLCO4PCvHq4qan6QtXYdMlhWgEWIdFfWNDYF xEbX3tomUIJmnbDjiK0G27GtLbxE2wIgQHvVf2iNBxMVuR28u/xqL+6LJcuxZri+7C ua+g7fbqGT1iw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Todd Freed Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso , Florian Westphal , Phil Sutter , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Ido Schimmel , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Boris Pismenny , Sabrina Dubroca , John Fastabend , Daniel Zahka , Willem de Bruijn , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?= , coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/2] netfilter: don't send decrypted skbs in clear text Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 00:36:21 +0000 Message-ID: <179435738198.2168702.12439855185550580348@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261111003111.3826942-1-toddfreed@meta.com> References: <20261111003111.3826942-1-toddfreed@meta.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.