From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794385000; b=GRXSR7oiIgjSZEUBGD70e3LYb+O3ugiTcvWKrnxIKw4PYKsoV8QehnaQwF6g9ekR+mAj bvLlSOAzI6UI1br7yQfuTDBrrh157gcXG+qyP9BM+Ez30R6lbaiE3q+EtAzBXqJyZktB9 xGfD26tkjyf1s4vQ6tRSoYbXR5iLUxgIxw+HArQNkf4YG+ICKM8bBAnBfvtjsYk1VZU8L 10aiDOg0Nf1fkZC/uaaimzxxPCPk5D/T6rZkCe3qavsGmtufcwYanM6S80adrlVM0wkOK xWJVurmb0HnWPzp8F1pwu2bsvDEedW2gU2EX4Db5B9Ie67i08DviOnvdzczrFl0oA/A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794385000; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; b=c08ycn78SciT8jjKiZ0/Ch3hlNWvDaou/5bI/e0+bP2+LTECum6NEMXEW7+Z5B0teavJ TvvTX4WImSqW63HUg/EbGHeqgrmK6cfrZB33PG6k7m+AKPPh1SSqLfopr40c+TI0Vnn/l xYlQ9yy1IjtcObzvrZuZ+DBmWyzkzcj8ddnIMbAjkc2N67ySJnM/ZgqZvUuMrUU5hn1bX hxe30yZVZvj4u/JRo4cae3ChNOIdZnkCwr8APRJQXtCwcP/0+QnizrdgobyGFn0Sii4go 2J3olJJH5Xdqmru4sDIBF3WxI3Oqltul2rv8jPbRVXdPmkIhbSJyitz0oT0W1jvM9Xg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=XrX+w3aJ; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5960B606A31C; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=XrX+w3aJ Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E42291F00A05; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:16:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794385000; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=XrX+w3aJ0o0l6i+4arJ+8uWvxzmuetDuCUcrn7c9afsFmKgVYr3q6apkKg7rKcd3j RPx9qBpubGoGvPzRXGwv5jezIlAfHOcwWDc04JP041dSOqfUm75AaNXafkYH4iy0Ej zF17oy7IQhdhg5OJ5VMFxPFaMRZacoEmqK46qw+bA4YRTFtShyDY2dvmWN66RIzJJF ePxULUCR0PYxiT+UPO2gk/ApXvoHIJ2chLisWkeXFger+jrBoA5iT9f6/nsPMcE9rO 4Asg3qPW/gis1DO38fOePCR/nbWbBTF9WwInGKePye9m3xMgBfuVx4Gge4YhX5B2UF MX9V4aPxW+viQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Tariq Toukan Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Andrea Parri , Boris Pismenny , Cosmin Ratiu , Gal Pressman , Leon Romanovsky , Leon Romanovsky , open list , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Mark Bloch , Patrisious Haddad , Raed Salem , Saeed Mahameed Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: IPsec, don't match upper proto selectors in crypto offload TX Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:16:38 +0000 Message-ID: <179438499843.2168702.6164625421208055212@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261111081337.3129580-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20261111081337.3129580-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.