From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794398811; b=hAeEFtPeMtXIBh+h5q/C+4EJyFeW/yL24lVmV/gZTfxnFIUy4kwi48ozTgrgqYH/4ma2 xtelvDqR0caL93dGCLdUwjMHCBRFCEe7NubMLiGsctBIZR4yQFGrFRGMl5tVkfKnBlNzh r27UwPyO+/IYbG9Hawn+L4nbY9rGu+kOuubN6uCxSUKwuRCEs72IMJVakMuxAoor2qN9r 0UPKvJio5s5731vWRyT1/46ik+yqfFvGcWhduJ8dcC737r+VhO4lpDE/o3Bhsy5o9R2sl 27pQqr/v4f8bBJowtf53SuSmh3qjhu1Xxjteou2i5Z8XEQROHo4QgGveqJSPnhhgwfQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794398811; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=oVTc5I6nKpBiLsItkBZmeShBR8ASpkDeEBpnWBZ++aw=; b=26hoXQv1+2sn/TaT/nEExKCOF1r2JApRW5LHjLtrm5GjBHFCmI/OMozrtBY2NJ5x40P4 4khyi3cjAeRjS/ooGuSImsZfAHYxADRoZbcD1Ju+9Du7cs40Ff6/ixnq9LWWrW8qipS71 1EavhHrR9kQwB4gAzfBQjUbTIlJ6BFSiooMbNfLqqmboJDrKqVz0Szf3YXYk+Lr/s9bn5 WPvSOeGIwl/6+OWnrUHSXpQfE1S1MIpX1tgFdvpaFxBQoOiL8k/evo1N29zKd/dMthfeL wasdW9LMJTFlT2WEq+W2iNI6xm//fbrexpp2GRKLYyXRVzQmP67Q529acfZHAnobtSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=crFMHtxj; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F28B606A31C; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=crFMHtxj Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25AA11F00A05; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:06:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794398810; bh=oVTc5I6nKpBiLsItkBZmeShBR8ASpkDeEBpnWBZ++aw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=crFMHtxjA2DK0o+D7oT4NtdIO4sHhu9vflTr8dsuN8yp3RRrLVBAWqCvxfscFigwH fD9f8uEVL7MrhXLE727SayWq9awQVdxixHlv1lkNL+KhtZSHK/hobxFCVobwmM4F7L ADjxvnNLP6SBJZKLqKMRNHa3jFuHH46KZmVaVepz8oz3oGliXiF0t10UIlSAP9kvxp LPYSfK6UoP+xplF14zzTCXGSM8pKbRPzwV3lju0F4TQBUkXatlrWmL7PGDixuv7+hV I5ilmUNa+R8uJR55ALVWxz9yNt2Ou4CwlTTBPxH8NNNozO/hUbZhhgzRDpW3YzzJHB /FITP/JNzsZeg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Dmitrii Iakunin Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , NB-Core Team , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "David S. Miller" , Willem de Bruijn , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: validate IPv4 checksum start in skb_csum_hwoffload_help() Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:06:49 +0000 Message-ID: <179439880966.2168702.12213632482366958763@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261111120448.49979-1-zeil@nebius.com> References: <20261111120448.49979-1-zeil@nebius.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by LLM and not proven at runtime). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or kernel messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.