mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] kprobes: Do not overwrite jump instruction when re-arming unoptimizing probe
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 23:13:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179440642973.328088.10282643330198602134.stgit@devnote2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179440640176.328088.17106877243326801914.stgit@devnote2>

From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

When an optimized probe is temporarily disarmed or disabled,
unoptimize_kprobe() places it on the unoptimizing list, but leaves
the relative jump in text until the optimizer thread runs.
__disarm_kprobe() explicitly skips arch_disarm_kprobe() when
kprobe_queued_unopt(p) is true.

However, if __arm_kprobe() is called before the unoptimization pass
executes, it unconditionally calls arch_arm_kprobe(p), writing a
breakpoint instruction over the first byte of the jump while leaving the
trailing bytes intact. optimize_kprobe(p) then dequeues the probe from
the unoptimizing queue, leaving the jump opcode overwritten with a
breakpoint in text while KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED remains set.

Skip calling arch_arm_kprobe() in __arm_kprobe() when
kprobe_queued_unopt(p) is true, keeping the existing relative jump intact
while unoptimization is cancelled. If optimize_kprobe() cannot optimize
the probe (e.g. due to a post_handler or disabled optimization), force
unoptimization immediately.

Fixes: 06e0d3b89da1 ("kprobes: Make optprobe optimizer multi-generational and asynchronous")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v3:
 - Restore the __arm_kprobe() fix that was accidentally dropped in v2
   while omitting the reuse_unused_kprobe() hunk superseded by commit
   1ffd6efb1b58 ("kprobes: Arm reused optprobe on cooling list").
---
 kernel/kprobes.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index c0637302eeae..f7cf77ca70de 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1263,6 +1263,19 @@ static void __init kprobe_sysctls_init(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
 
+/* Return true if the probe is queued on unoptimizing lists */
+static bool kprobe_queued_unopt(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	struct optimized_kprobe *op;
+
+	if (kprobe_aggrprobe(p)) {
+		op = container_of(p, struct optimized_kprobe, kp);
+		if (optprobe_queued_unopt(op))
+			return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 /* Put a breakpoint for a probe. */
 static void __arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
@@ -1276,21 +1289,11 @@ static void __arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 		/* Fallback to unoptimized kprobe */
 		unoptimize_kprobe(_p, true);
 
-	arch_arm_kprobe(p);
+	if (!kprobe_queued_unopt(p))
+		arch_arm_kprobe(p);
 	optimize_kprobe(p);	/* Try to optimize (add kprobe to a list) */
-}
-
-/* Return true if the probe is queued on unoptimizing lists */
-static bool kprobe_queued_unopt(struct kprobe *p)
-{
-	struct optimized_kprobe *op;
-
-	if (kprobe_aggrprobe(p)) {
-		op = container_of(p, struct optimized_kprobe, kp);
-		if (optprobe_queued_unopt(op))
-			return true;
-	}
-	return false;
+	if (unlikely(kprobe_queued_unopt(p)))
+		unoptimize_kprobe(p, true);
 }
 
 /* Remove the breakpoint of a probe. */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11 14:13 [PATCH v3 0/5] kprobes: Fixes for ftrace ops and optprobe state machine Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-11-11 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] kprobes: Switch ftrace ops when adding probe with post_handler Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-11-11 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] kprobes: Fix UAF and queue cooling probes on forced unoptimization Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-11-11 14:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [this message]
2026-11-11 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] kprobes: Re-optimize blocked sibling probe when cooling finishes Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-11-11 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] kprobes: Add KUnit test cases for kprobes regressions Masami Hiramatsu (Google)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179440642973.328088.10282643330198602134.stgit@devnote2 \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mt4022@columbia.edu \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®