From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794411465; b=0ee/+2I+z7Uej74CXNUqK0bNBRxiR3NWrEpBcBeN86qLI8PSAMItV8d1p37C3fY0Kl7Q 84hRZAVhRONyk1m/WopkOi+AJvKDsH7E+0GB4wcSmv1teL31waNRrsPCQZA0PDhroqTOl ciSpfu/cA2kP5GXOY+635NvcVF3lRIRsglOOpUm+AtTnwY/93m8sPARi6bXoXh9eh8QMO 49koe2jwG8AZb1erlRrLYWe7WtgYFVCKOyo7nuIx8BYDq8Fk8ySAb7xY8PiQbIA9QSV9s nFjS5+JWBLGre8siVj2lyCmoM1aZJ6mAmYF3u0GZwleIsC/wQja/582wy9F3Lyfvkbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794411465; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=oVTc5I6nKpBiLsItkBZmeShBR8ASpkDeEBpnWBZ++aw=; b=kGg5GwkATBoi5zSPGRpVfutqMAcwl9SjINuERm8xIjnjyA7sVnSGfvoyUZ+o9HhuANzA ExEM7FdS/Nj9f4U6EHPGbI6eKWwrQTdRtr6qVtz6l05zm05rctCDuihi7Mi+OR6ZmG70O zYwz0ZnCvvUWDQyErwRnNtVY3+N51PVvK+TxW7buQqqtec4pUM4PqnTAJUnwNBj0Wm1Zp vGSOHINXoIpesEEsGlLqIv7sh1dQr50xEfBJJ7Zb6uDm7jq955YywDdmdKthrZLoLrzml bHiwNNi4dOC5SlIsxu5F3xz8gcK5GZO41xtCJP/vxpBcd21UUk7I4toZBDaMgh1B+xQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=SW4KK3W9; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40549606A339; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 15:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=SW4KK3W9 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A6871F00A06; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 15:37:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794411464; bh=oVTc5I6nKpBiLsItkBZmeShBR8ASpkDeEBpnWBZ++aw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=SW4KK3W9O6e+ReIFSLAGBYlbXrw5R51EnC+AQwBArU7s4WtOgWrWUnVyi1S+zR9NN XFv0p2FpPVTBo2UopI01mc42Z5CTHQjZ1DP+3RsOv1Dh2uF8GHwgOK/JMKzAPijWIT tO5Us36UZqx1o+lgOK14GbpBQPmfmvlVEoruaklEp75PrTWHLAxxHL2ncKngzatl7p XHDC40wrER6E6Z0O2Il5GkNcfxG7eYKyRn+iAuY4fSQBy3gySU6xk/lxqou2WAZZ2E rqYDQefb8nuLZ1GjB6h7s8dwRYc58rlsMlhdzq0jf8ewGhoBDsnAuIoGMof4gZTwRi ztQ2gNI6pF2ig== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Tristan Madani Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Christian Brauner , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Tristan Madani Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: cls_flow: pin file with get_file_rcu before reading f_cred Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 15:37:43 +0000 Message-ID: <179441146372.2168702.5462633106767625518@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261111153106.580776-1-tristmd@gmail.com> References: <20261111153106.580776-1-tristmd@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by LLM and not proven at runtime). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or kernel messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.