From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753515AbXDIPg0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:36:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753521AbXDIPg0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:36:26 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:44299 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753515AbXDIPgZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:36:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17946.5545.663353.735623@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:30:01 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] move die notifier handling to common code In-Reply-To: <20070326065524.GA1163@lst.de> References: <20070319160218.GA27462@lst.de> <17927.8857.752570.69739@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070326065524.GA1163@lst.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > I tend to agree. Unfortunately powers higher than me like these > horrible notifier schemes. Then again at least the die path is not > performance critical unlike the page faul path where I still need a > comment for you on getting rid of the notifier. Sounds reasonable. If you posted a patch I missed it. :) Paul.