From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404F9C4338F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CF760F9B for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235956AbhG1Kol (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:44:41 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:56509 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232609AbhG1Kod (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:44:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1627469071; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wVPX76oa+ikEVer1UL4g4IfAB5UX3EuLtEsoXtArruM=; b=CC6aYbCijMdrn5YCpKiVOY9ICYi2uvt/lUeXk0QJy6oxr/t5kZiWVJf/fMP0gKfi2weQgT zvM6lWK0wEMYPytmw3myuB95jH9NRl49tvgrI0LT26LHjoAFXWsxLdW5j0AYRCp+6QlS13 /m4UcP8mXot5hU2D5mgoMPaPt+U20w0= Received: from mail-ej1-f70.google.com (mail-ej1-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-45-iRU8VLxPNjGFW0XI-jW7hw-1; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:44:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: iRU8VLxPNjGFW0XI-jW7hw-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f70.google.com with SMTP id yl23-20020a17090693f7b029051a448bab28so668281ejb.17 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 03:44:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wVPX76oa+ikEVer1UL4g4IfAB5UX3EuLtEsoXtArruM=; b=CaF3HaQyT7+n957ssGfLfht1UOc5YwT6M3xhbU4MVbLe3NAS8OOAL4hBtLi5pvszXe fvvDy9883zI/QFUzZDbZbmg0ZqqwhUuuRGhTBmCviX295G7zeda5J9fa0JJ6UlSRY+dU 6ddKzwKUF35DvEvu6If7CvNqd6c/0CMfKuZ439tDnlyPiAtKDSVG0q+CnHmT38ijZzQJ YeOvtBbdwfV1s6yNrFuCVekyEJuxFYEAIaBpN+FwfsJVrJXwkPgla+wUVVT47csrdGkP mT0Bocvt4XvJiQTtavD8XzvXld/1uDgsVdZRFqhglqkJeyeLRLbGKBk17sviBobmJM4d m3gg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tvOkFvcxn/Xy1dUvFEv7J0F6cz9HlBSekXGufZm9X/RyI0Q4W ppsmhQNSxpDjsAAgeKDINCiLpRWKVOWUC0MsrSpWTkk3MWE4bbMmsw6YXHgGtyzQYTVFqc1oYWS w/aO6DBP6OdvyemVS8mxqnIjq X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2817:: with SMTP id r23mr26205724ejc.285.1627469069102; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 03:44:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWcLtMBxOnIs64TlNoB0jmKwP4hUfZ5cywxkR9K10TtWPUd3iAhD3JxMJ1jDhe556eWIuu2A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2817:: with SMTP id r23mr26205710ejc.285.1627469068919; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 03:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1.localdomain (2001-1c00-0c1e-bf00-1054-9d19-e0f0-8214.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:1054:9d19:e0f0:8214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o14sm2472320eds.55.2021.07.28.03.44.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 03:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: LED subsystem lagging maintenance To: Pavel Machek , Andy Shevchenko Cc: Linux LED Subsystem , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Walleij , Geert Uytterhoeven , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <20210728103551.GA31304@amd> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: <179c4bce-ce9b-c9a8-4f24-cb4b3397e0f0@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:44:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210728103551.GA31304@amd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 7/28/21 12:35 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is >> a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that >> someone can help Pavel to sort things out. >> >> In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do >> in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a >> (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch >> flow? > > To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that > important to begin with, because of lacking explanation, and because > you pushed a bit too hard. > > Yes, I'm quite busy in -rc1 to -rc3 timeframe with stable reviews. No, > LED subsystem is not orphaned. It is good to hear that you are still actively maintaining the LED subsystem, thank you. This thread does remind me that I was planning on re-sending this LED patch which seems to have fallen through the cracks: https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20210221115208.105203-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/ Can you pick this one up please? Or shall I resend it? Regards, Hans