From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Fix boot failure when SMP MP-table is based at 0
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 16:01:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17a1c480-d0aa-b272-7ca3-5dd2cf2fd7dc@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee912340-4b16-2b62-7e92-66dfb4a28ef8@zytor.com>
On 11/6/2017 3:41 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/06/17 12:17, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> When crosvm is used to boot a kernel as a VM, the SMP MP-table is found
>> at physical address 0x0. This causes mpf_base to be set to 0 and a
>> subsequent "if (!mpf_base)" check in default_get_smp_config() results in
>> the MP-table not being parsed. Further into the boot this results in an
>> oops when attempting a read_apic_id().
>>
>> Add a boolean variable that is set to true when the MP-table is found.
>> Use this variable for testing if the MP-table was found so that even a
>> value of 0 for mpf_base will result in continued parsing of the MP-table.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>
> Ahem... did anyone ever tell you that this is an epicly bad idea on your
> part? The low megabyte of physical memory has very special meaning on
> x86, and deviating from the standard use of this memory is a *very*
> dangerous thing to do, and imposing on the kernel a "fake null pointer"
> requirement that exists only for the convenience of your particular
> brokenness is not okay.
>
> -hpa
That was my initial thought... what was something doing down at the start
of memory. But when I looked at default_find_smp_config() it specifically
scans the bottom 1K for a an MP-table signature. I was hoping to get some
feedback as to whether this would really be an acceptable thing to do. So
I'm good with this patch being rejected, but the change I made in
5997efb96756 ("x86/boot: Use memremap() to map the MPF and MPC data")
does break something that was working before.
Thanks,
Tom
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-06 20:17 Tom Lendacky
2017-11-06 20:25 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-11-06 21:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-11-06 22:01 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2017-11-06 23:00 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-11-16 11:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-08 8:37 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2017-11-16 9:16 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2017-11-16 9:20 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2017-11-17 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-17 15:25 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17a1c480-d0aa-b272-7ca3-5dd2cf2fd7dc@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome