mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Fix boot failure when SMP MP-table is based at 0
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 16:01:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17a1c480-d0aa-b272-7ca3-5dd2cf2fd7dc@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee912340-4b16-2b62-7e92-66dfb4a28ef8@zytor.com>

On 11/6/2017 3:41 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/06/17 12:17, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> When crosvm is used to boot a kernel as a VM, the SMP MP-table is found
>> at physical address 0x0. This causes mpf_base to be set to 0 and a
>> subsequent "if (!mpf_base)" check in default_get_smp_config() results in
>> the MP-table not being parsed.  Further into the boot this results in an
>> oops when attempting a read_apic_id().
>>
>> Add a boolean variable that is set to true when the MP-table is found.
>> Use this variable for testing if the MP-table was found so that even a
>> value of 0 for mpf_base will result in continued parsing of the MP-table.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> 
> Ahem... did anyone ever tell you that this is an epicly bad idea on your
> part?  The low megabyte of physical memory has very special meaning on
> x86, and deviating from the standard use of this memory is a *very*
> dangerous thing to do, and imposing on the kernel a "fake null pointer"
> requirement that exists only for the convenience of your particular
> brokenness is not okay.
> 
> 	-hpa

That was my initial thought... what was something doing down at the start
of memory.  But when I looked at default_find_smp_config() it specifically
scans the bottom 1K for a an MP-table signature. I was hoping to get some
feedback as to whether this would really be an acceptable thing to do. So
I'm good with this patch being rejected, but the change I made in

5997efb96756 ("x86/boot: Use memremap() to map the MPF and MPC data")

does break something that was working before.

Thanks,
Tom

> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-06 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-06 20:17 Tom Lendacky
2017-11-06 20:25 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-11-06 21:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-11-06 22:01   ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2017-11-06 23:00     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-11-16 11:40       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-08  8:37     ` Tomeu Vizoso
2017-11-16  9:16       ` Tomeu Vizoso
2017-11-16  9:20         ` Tomeu Vizoso
2017-11-17 13:03     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-17 15:25 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17a1c480-d0aa-b272-7ca3-5dd2cf2fd7dc@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome