From: Yoshifumi SHU <envzhu@gmail.com>
To: arnd@kernel.org
Cc: Frank.Li@nxp.com, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi,
alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, andreas@kemnade.info,
andrew@lunn.ch, arnd@arndb.de, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev,
conor+dt@kernel.org, david@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, enelsonmoore@gmail.com,
festevam@gmail.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
gregory.clement@bootlin.com, imx@lists.linux.dev,
kernel@pengutronix.de, khilman@baylibre.com,
kmehltretter@gmail.com, kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com,
krzk@kernel.org, linusw@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
liviu.dudau@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com,
npitre@baylibre.com, robert.jarzmik@free.fr, robh@kernel.org,
rogerq@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, shawnguo@kernel.org,
soc@lists.linux.dev, stefan@agner.ch, sudeep.holla@kernel.org,
tony@atomide.com, vz@mleia.com, thehajime@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] ARM: deprecated platform removal
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:06:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17a74e90-27d1-4954-86a8-491267f00cb8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914140821.1805449-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Hi Arnd and all,
I would like to request that the core Arm Cortex-M support be retained, specifically for v8-M.
I'm heavily using Arm Cortex-M / NOMMU Linux for academic research.
In particular, I frequently run Linux on newer Arm v8-M (Cortex-M33/M55/M85) processors.
However, dropping CONFIG_CPU_V7M also removes support for these newer CPUs.
Because v8-M is highly compatible with the older v7-M (Cortex-M3/M4/M7), the v8-M support is tightly coupled with CONFIG_CPU_V7M, despite the name.
The major differences are essentially CPU IDs and PMSAv8 MPU support.
So I need the majority of CONFIG_CPU_V7M to support Arm v8-M.
Regarding platform support, I don't need Linux-side device drivers.
In my current setup, Linux runs in a virtualized environment hosted by an RTOS (like Zephyr) and accesses devices through virtio served by the RTOS.
I also understand that maintaining legacy MCU platform support is a significant burden.
Therefore, I don't object to removing the platform support, though the MPS platform remains convenient for bare-metal testing.
I am willing to help maintain this support, including modernizing the relevant code. I can regularly test kernels on real Armv8-M hardware.
If an active maintainer is required to keep the support, I am willing to take on that responsibility.
Please let me know how I can help keep the support.
Thanks,
Yoshifumi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 14:08 Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] ARM: omap2: remove omap24xx support Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-21 16:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2026-09-21 11:06 ` Yoshifumi SHU [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17a74e90-27d1-4954-86a8-491267f00cb8@gmail.com \
--to=envzhu@gmail.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=enelsonmoore@gmail.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=npitre@baylibre.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=soc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=thehajime@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®