From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E89C433EF for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D6C60FE3 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231484AbhKDMY2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 08:24:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42726 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229809AbhKDMYZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 08:24:25 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0361DC061714; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 05:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: andrzej.p) with ESMTPSA id 730751F46101 Subject: Re: [RFC] tty/sysrq: Add alternative SysRq key To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dmitry Torokhov , Jiri Slaby , kernel@collabora.com References: <20211103155438.11167-1-andrzej.p@collabora.com> <20211104120111.GB23122@duo.ucw.cz> From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz Message-ID: <17ccc35d-441c-70c1-a80a-28a4ff824535@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:21:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211104120111.GB23122@duo.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Pavel, W dniu 04.11.2021 o 13:01, Pavel Machek pisze: > Hi! > >> There exist machines which don't have SysRq key at all, e.g. chromebooks. >> >> This patch allows configuring an alternative key to act as SysRq. Devices >> which declare KEY_SYSRQ in their 'keybit' bitmap continue using KEY_SYSRQ, >> but other devices use the alternative SysRq key instead, by default F10. >> Which key is actually used can be modified with sysrq's module >> parameter. > > Is F10 sensible default? Would it make sense to use something like > alt-shift-esc so that this can be enabled by default? Why "alt-shift-esc" could be enabled by default? Do you mean to enable it for all systems regardless of whether they declare or don't declare KEY_SYSRQ in their 'keybit' bitmap? Andrzej