From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758916AbXGDFDo (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 01:03:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756289AbXGDFDB (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 01:03:01 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:37499 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756177AbXGDFC6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 01:02:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18059.5165.861038.392332@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:29:49 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Matthew Garrett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway In-Reply-To: <200707032332.49694.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20070703042916.GA17240@srcf.ucam.org> <200707031456.40890.rjw@sisk.pl> <1183497290.3388.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200707032332.49694.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > Still, do you really think that we're ready to drop it _right_ _now_ (I'm > referring to suspend only) and if so than on what basis (except that you > don't like it, which falls short of being a techical argument)? The basis is that it (the freezer) causes more deadlocks and other problems than it avoids, so it's a net win to remove it. Paul.