From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755490AbXHBAuO (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:50:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753758AbXHBAt7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:49:59 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51527 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753404AbXHBAt6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:49:58 -0400 From: Neil Brown To: Tejun Heo Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:49:42 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18097.10790.205449.176104@notabene.brown> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 026 of 35] Split any large bios that arrive at __make_request. In-Reply-To: message from Tejun Heo on Thursday August 2 References: <20070731112539.22428.patches@notabene> <1070731021804.25499@suse.de> <20070801175636.GJ13674@htj.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D Hmmm... Patches don't apply beyond this one. I'm applying against > clean 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 grabbed using ketchup. > So do you mean 027 doesn't apply, or that 028 doesn't apply next? It is possible that you missed 027. It originally has 3 consecutive Xs in the subject line, so vger.kernel.org bounced it. I re-sent it, but it would have had a different References header and the might not appear in the same thread. If you confirm that 027 isn't applying, I'll track down what happened. Thanks, NeilBrown