From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DF6C19F2B for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 17:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232305AbiHARVQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2022 13:21:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232386AbiHARVN (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2022 13:21:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f54.google.com (mail-pj1-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD6C9FD3; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 10:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-f54.google.com with SMTP id pm17so5706809pjb.3; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 10:21:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=PIN4B1+zujt9LiBMql7z7J0iPpi02q4Ca3aFC6/SCYg=; b=uX0Zi/juFXI8I7baEHIRUIu8+mj60p1BlJp+TK5qkjkrJh3d+sNI5b/ii52MhBwXDa ubcELTGiemLkU2AO975hDKkvSZYdsyJItilEUML+thiftoX/c2Mg7SqLkD3s50O+OkpF jyGlXkvpG7eaUsN3IyBp2JrEScZreq07KgvSmu7nK4VR8UX48zmU4DlkH+mrzKPLDqNU kHOx5ndPCBzwRLndY+RKvTFTELJCknfokq8iV7V6TbSH4v1y4xwhIVSWeJJMt82wvFet aWK5Xrlp6Mqhpi6b88xVh+D+8dG0utH+MZttdFD91vz83QSxdG8fAysUjHFnpzm9hQji rozQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1eMrD5wf4C3HygWZHYN1s1bD969740ObDKvME+/My0FvNEzQbv wOkFUzUTrOBxSEcJADAz2y4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6ETjSTmK+NOR8RRKSSy2RLoYq0f95Q5qBeCvVX2eqgmgjwfpPciLHhaHLL9Vibz7xBwoR/EQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8206:b0:16e:c738:d492 with SMTP id x6-20020a170902820600b0016ec738d492mr13180712pln.5.1659374471426; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 10:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:15c:211:201:6496:b2a7:616f:954d? ([2620:15c:211:201:6496:b2a7:616f:954d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s2-20020a632142000000b0041a8f882e5bsm7833024pgm.42.2022.08.01.10.21.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Aug 2022 10:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1809cefc-0c59-ef6c-c3da-7695722a8b78@acm.org> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 10:21:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt Content-Language: en-US To: Kiwoong Kim , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, beanhuo@micron.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, sc.suh@samsung.com, hy50.seo@samsung.com, sh425.lee@samsung.com, bhoon95.kim@samsung.com References: <1659323380-161341-1-git-send-email-kwmad.kim@samsung.com> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <1659323380-161341-1-git-send-email-kwmad.kim@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/31/22 20:09, Kiwoong Kim wrote: > Link lost is treated as fatal error with the following > patch, but its event isn't registered as interrupt source, > so I enable it. > -- > scsi: ufs: Treat link loss as fatal error Is this patch perhaps intended as a fix for patch "scsi: ufs: Treat link loss as fatal error"? If so, does it need a Fixes: tag? Thanks, Bart.