From: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Andrew Kilroy <andrew.kilroy@arm.com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [External] : [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add topdown L1 metrics for neoverse-n2
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:41:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <180a34c2-f68d-6f4d-da74-7bbb80e9e65c@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57315669-e6e7-08b8-a252-bc35d4fecc01@arm.com>
在 2022/11/22 下午10:00, James Clark 写道:
>
>
> On 21/11/2022 17:55, John Garry wrote:
>> On 21/11/2022 15:17, Jing Zhang wrote:
>>> I'm sorry that I misunderstood the purpose of putting metric as
>>> arch_std_event at first,
>>> and now it works after the modification over your suggestion.
>>>
>>> But there are also a few questions:
>>>
>>> 1. The value of the slot in the topdownL1 is various in different
>>> architectures, for example,
>>> the slot is 5 on neoverse-n2. If I put topdownL1 metric as
>>> arch_std_event, then I need to
>>> specify the slot to 5 in n2. I can specify slot values in metric like
>>> below, but is there any
>>> other concise way to do this?
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-n2/metrics.json
>>> b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-n2/metrics.json
>>> index 8ff1dfe..b473baf 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-n2/metrics.json
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-n2/metrics.json
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,23 @@
>>> [
>>> + {
>>> + "MetricExpr": "5",
>>> + "PublicDescription": "A pipeline slot represents the
>>> hardware resources needed to process one uOp",
>>> + "BriefDescription": "A pipeline slot represents the
>>> hardware resources needed to process one uOp",
>>> + "MetricName": "slot"
>>
>> Ehhh....I'm not sure if that is a good idea. Ian or anyone else have an
>> opinion on this? It is possible to reuse metrics, so it should work, but...
>>
>> One problem is that "slot" would show up as a metric, which you would
>> not want.
>>
>> Alternatively I was going to suggest that you can overwrite specific std
>> arch event attributes. So for example of frontend_bound, you could have:
>
> I would agree with not having this and just hard coding the 5 wherever
> it's needed. Once we have a few different sets of metrics in place maybe
> we can start to look at deduplication, but for now I don't see the value.
>
>>
>> + b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-n2/metrics.json
>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
>> [
>> {
>> "ArchStdEvent": "FRONTEND_BOUND",
>> "MetricExpr": "(stall_slot_frontend - cpu_cycles) / (5 *
>> cpu_cycles)",
>> },
>>
>>> + }
>>> + {
>>> + "ArchStdEvent": "FRONTEND_BOUND"
>>> + },
>>> + {
>>> + "ArchStdEvent": "BACKEND_BOUND"
>>> + },
>>> + {
>>> + "ArchStdEvent": "WASTED"
>>> + },
>>> + {
>>> + "ArchStdEvent": "RETIRING"
>>> + },
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. Should I add the topdownL1 metric to
>>> tools/perf/pmu-event/recommended.json,
>>> or create a new json file to place the general metric?
>>
>> It would not belong in recommended.json as that is specifically for
>> arch-recommended events. It would really just depend on where the value
>> comes from, i.e. arm arm or sbsa.
>>
>
> For what we're going to publish shortly we'll be generating a
> metrics.json file for each CPU. It will be autogenerated so I don't
> think duplication will be an issue and I'm expecting that there will be
> differences in the topdown metrics between CPUs anyway. So I would also
> vote to not put it in recommended.json
>
I will create a new sbsa.json file in tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/
to place metrics that may be common between some CPUs, just like arch_std_event.
If the topdown metrics are different in other CPUs, we can overwrite the
metric expression.
For example:
+++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/sbsa.json
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+[
+ {
+ "MetricExpr": "stall_slot_frontend / (slot * cpu_cycles)",
+ "PublicDescription": "Frontend bound L1 topdown metric",
+ "BriefDescription": "Frontend bound L1 topdown metric",
+ "MetricGroup": "TopDownL1",
+ "MetricName": "FRONTEND_BOUND"
+ }
+]
+ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-n2/metrics.json
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+[
+ {
+ "ArchStdEvent": "FRONTEND_BOUND",
+ "MetricExpr": "(stall_slot_frontend - cpu_cycles) / (5 * cpu_cycles)",
+ }
+]
In addition, I can also add TLB, Cache, Branch, InstructionMix, PEutilization
and other metric groups into sbsa.json, because they are also applicable to
neoverse-n1. Above metrics are described in the documentation of neoverse-n1:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/PJDOC-466751330-547673/r4p1/
Thanks,
Jing
>>>
>>> Looking forward to your reply.
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-31 11:11 [PATCH RFC 0/6] Add " Jing Zhang
2022-10-31 11:11 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add topdown L1 " Jing Zhang
2022-10-31 11:11 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add TLB " Jing Zhang
2022-10-31 11:11 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add cache " Jing Zhang
2022-10-31 11:11 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add branch " Jing Zhang
2022-10-31 11:11 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add PE utilization " Jing Zhang
2022-10-31 11:11 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add instruction mix " Jing Zhang
2022-11-14 7:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Add " Jing Zhang
2022-11-24 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 " Jing Zhang
2022-11-24 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add topdown L1 " Jing Zhang
2022-11-24 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add TLB " Jing Zhang
2022-11-24 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add cache " Jing Zhang
2022-11-24 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add branch " Jing Zhang
2022-11-24 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add PE utilization " Jing Zhang
2022-11-30 18:58 ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-01 11:08 ` Jing Zhang
2022-12-02 20:05 ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-04 7:10 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-24 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add instruction mix " Jing Zhang
2022-11-14 7:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add topdown L1 " Jing Zhang
2022-11-14 12:59 ` [External] : " John Garry
2022-11-15 8:43 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-15 11:19 ` John Garry
2022-11-21 9:53 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-21 10:22 ` John Garry
2022-11-21 15:17 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-21 17:55 ` John Garry
2022-11-22 9:24 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-22 14:00 ` James Clark
2022-11-22 15:41 ` Jing Zhang [this message]
2022-11-23 14:26 ` James Clark
2022-11-24 16:32 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-24 16:51 ` James Clark
2022-11-14 7:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add TLB " Jing Zhang
2022-11-14 7:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add cache " Jing Zhang
2022-11-14 8:35 ` Xing Zhengjun
2022-11-15 6:28 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-14 7:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add branch " Jing Zhang
2022-11-14 7:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add PE utilization " Jing Zhang
2022-11-14 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] perf vendor events arm64: Add instruction mix " Jing Zhang
2022-11-16 11:19 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] Add " James Clark
2022-11-16 15:26 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-21 11:51 ` James Clark
2022-11-22 7:11 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-22 11:53 ` James Clark
2022-11-19 3:30 ` Jing Zhang
[not found] ` <CAP-5=fW+Z_Tc3BfK1bRKUeKWfxtPfoZXL9D2BhcU1SzNOruSsg@mail.gmail.com>
2022-11-20 3:49 ` Jing Zhang
2022-11-21 11:55 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=180a34c2-f68d-6f4d-da74-7bbb80e9e65c@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.kilroy@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®