mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 RESEND 4/6] perf/core: Split out AUX buffer allocation
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 12:08:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <180cb0c2-0164-4c8d-947b-a86be2a2912e@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250812100613.GH4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 12:06:13PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 02:21:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
>
> Well, there's still that problem below. That was a goto unlock and would
> pass through the perf_mmap_account() and atomic_inc(mmap_count), where
> now it does not.

Yep, you're right, damn it.

I managed to miss this one among all the rest, and I was looking very very
carefully bit-by-bit... goes to show just how horrible the code was in teh first
place.

>
> Arguably it should not do the perf_mmap_account(), but lets keep the
> code functionally equivalent for now.
>
> Anyway, I've re-done these two break-out patches in a more fine grained
> fashion and will post a new series in a few.

OK will take a look.

>
> > > ---
> > > V2: Fixup invers condition and add the dropped flags setup back - Lorenzo
> > >     Fixup subject line to match the content
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/events/core.c |  137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > > @@ -6970,12 +6970,79 @@ static void perf_mmap_account(struct vm_
> > >  	atomic64_add(extra, &vma->vm_mm->pinned_vm);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int perf_mmap_aux(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct perf_event *event,
> > > +			 unsigned long nr_pages)
> > > +{
> > > +	long user_extra = nr_pages, extra = 0;
> > > +	struct perf_buffer *rb = event->rb;
> > > +	u64 aux_offset, aux_size;
> > > +	int ret, rb_flags = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * AUX area mapping: if rb->aux_nr_pages != 0, it's already
> > > +	 * mapped, all subsequent mappings should have the same size
> > > +	 * and offset. Must be above the normal perf buffer.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	aux_offset = READ_ONCE(rb->user_page->aux_offset);
> > > +	aux_size = READ_ONCE(rb->user_page->aux_size);
> > > +
> > > +	if (aux_offset < perf_data_size(rb) + PAGE_SIZE)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if (aux_offset != vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Already mapped with a different offset */
> > > +	if (rb_has_aux(rb) && rb->aux_pgoff != vma->vm_pgoff)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if (aux_size != nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Already mapped with a different size */
> > > +	if (rb_has_aux(rb) && rb->aux_nr_pages != nr_pages)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* If this succeeds, subsequent failures have to undo it */
> > > +	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&rb->mmap_count))
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* If mapped, attach to it */
> > > +	if (rb_has_aux(rb)) {
> > > +		atomic_inc(&rb->aux_mmap_count);
> > > +		return 0;
>
> here, the return 0 should've been a goto to...

Yeah... I think I had assumed we fixed this up somehow on the return but of
course we can't since we moved the perf_map_account() here (nor could we
differentiate return values).

But I think partly a product of the diff not showing that bit and, despite
checking line-by-line against old version I just about missed this one.

Yeah, this code, this refactor is very much needed!

>
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (!perf_mmap_calc_limits(vma, &user_extra, &extra)) {
> > > +		atomic_dec(&rb->mmap_count);
> > > +		return -EPERM;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
> > > +		rb_flags |= RING_BUFFER_WRITABLE;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = rb_alloc_aux(rb, event, vma->vm_pgoff, nr_pages,
> > > +			   event->attr.aux_watermark, rb_flags);
> > > +	if (ret) {
> > > +		atomic_dec(&rb->mmap_count);
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	atomic_set(&rb->aux_mmap_count, 1);
> > > +	rb->aux_mmap_locked = extra;
>
> here:
>
> > > +	perf_mmap_account(vma, user_extra, extra);
> > > +	atomic_inc(&event->mmap_count);
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-12 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11 12:36 [patch V2 RESEND 0/6] perf: Convert mmap() related reference counts to refcount_t Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-11 12:36 ` [patch V2 RESEND 1/6] perf/core: Remove redundant condition for AUX buffer size Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-11 12:55   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-11 12:36 ` [patch V2 RESEND 2/6] perf/core: Split out mlock limit handling Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-11 12:57   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-11 12:36 ` [patch V2 RESEND 3/6] perf/core: Split out VM accounting Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-11 12:58   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-11 12:36 ` [patch V2 RESEND 4/6] perf/core: Split out AUX buffer allocation Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-11 13:21   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 10:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-12 11:08       ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-08-11 12:36 ` [patch V2 RESEND 5/6] perf/core: Split the ringbuffer mmap() and allocation code out Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-11 13:56   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-11 14:10     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-11 12:36 ` [patch V2 RESEND 6/6] perf/core: Convert mmap() refcounts to refcount_t Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-11 14:12   ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=180cb0c2-0164-4c8d-947b-a86be2a2912e@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®