From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761007AbXHQAk3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:40:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750850AbXHQAkU (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:40:20 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:38880 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbXHQAkS (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:40:18 -0400 From: Neil Brown To: Jens Axboe Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:40:11 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18116.61035.621593.588647@notabene.brown> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 6] A few block-layer tidy-up patches. In-Reply-To: message from Jens Axboe on Thursday August 16 References: <20070816211551.11839.patches@notabene> <20070816113638.GX23758@kernel.dk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D On Thu, Aug 16 2007, NeilBrown wrote: > > Following are 5 patches which - I think - clean up various bits and pieces > > in the block layer. > > > > The only part that might be seen as a function change rather than > > simply rearranging code is in ps3disk where bvec_kmap_irq is used > > instead of bio_kmap_atomic (so interrupts are disabled). > > > > The only other user of bvec_kmap_irq is ide-floppy.c. If that does > > need to disable interrupts, and ps3disk doesn't, make the disabling of > > interrupts should be separated from the kmapping?? > > Applied 1-6, thanks! BTW, your patch #2 doesn't apply cleanly on > floppy.c in current -git, and there has been no changes there since July > 24th. So you must be diffing against something else? Yes, current -mm. That is where I usually work. I'll make sure future patches are against -linus or -block. > > You also don't re-indent and remove one nesting when removing > bio_for_each_segment(). It makes it easier to review, but I formatted > that as well since I had to hand-apply patch #2. I meant to mention that in the changelog comment. I deliberately didn't re-indent most of the loops to ease review. I was going to send an indent-only patch it the first was accepted. No need now :-) > > Please inspect the #block-2.6.24 branch to see the result. I don't know where to look for this. I checked http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git but they don't seem to be there. ?? Thanks, NeilBrown