From: "Dave Johnson" <djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jes@trained-monkey.org, mchan@broadcom.com,
ram.vepa@neterion.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bguo@sw.starentnetworks.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:47:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18223.22296.654548.764588@zeus.sw.starentnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472A6089.7020104@hp.com>
This patch changes the following drivers to use vlan_hwaccel_rx()
and/or vlan_hwaccel_receive_skb() with a NULL vlan group if needed as
they are not setup to dynamically enable/disable vlan removal in
their MAC based on the vlan group:
drivers/net/tg3.c Tested on BCM5704, looks good
drivers/net/bnx2.c Tested on BCM5708, looks good
drivers/net/acenic.c Not tested, I don't have one of these
drivers/net/s2io.c Not tested, I don't have one of these
In addition, these drivers might also need changes, but should
probably be done by the maintainer as it's not clear exactly what
change is needed:
drivers/net/amd8111e.c
drivers/net/cxgb3/*
Signed-off-by: Dave Johnson <djohnson@sw.starentnetworks.com>
===== drivers/net/acenic.c 1.77 vs edited =====
--- 1.77/drivers/net/acenic.c 2007-07-24 16:28:41 -04:00
+++ edited/drivers/net/acenic.c 2007-11-03 12:27:40 -04:00
@@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@
/* send it up */
#if ACENIC_DO_VLAN
- if (ap->vlgrp && (bd_flags & BD_FLG_VLAN_TAG)) {
+ if (bd_flags & BD_FLG_VLAN_TAG) {
vlan_hwaccel_rx(skb, ap->vlgrp, retdesc->vlan);
} else
#endif
===== drivers/net/bnx2.c 1.135 vs edited =====
--- 1.135/drivers/net/bnx2.c 2007-09-20 15:14:21 -04:00
+++ edited/drivers/net/bnx2.c 2007-11-05 09:34:26 -05:00
@@ -2493,7 +2493,8 @@
}
#ifdef BCM_VLAN
- if ((status & L2_FHDR_STATUS_L2_VLAN_TAG) && (bp->vlgrp != 0)) {
+ if ((status & L2_FHDR_STATUS_L2_VLAN_TAG) &&
+ (bp->vlgrp || (bp->flags & ASF_ENABLE_FLAG))) {
vlan_hwaccel_receive_skb(skb, bp->vlgrp,
rx_hdr->l2_fhdr_vlan_tag);
}
===== drivers/net/s2io.c 1.124 vs edited =====
--- 1.124/drivers/net/s2io.c 2007-08-03 18:10:44 -04:00
+++ edited/drivers/net/s2io.c 2007-11-03 12:29:09 -04:00
@@ -6834,8 +6834,7 @@
sp->mac_control.stats_info->sw_stat.mem_freed += skb->truesize;
if (!sp->lro) {
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
- if ((sp->vlgrp && RXD_GET_VLAN_TAG(rxdp->Control_2) &&
- vlan_strip_flag)) {
+ if (RXD_GET_VLAN_TAG(rxdp->Control_2) && vlan_strip_flag) {
/* Queueing the vlan frame to the upper layer */
if (napi)
vlan_hwaccel_receive_skb(skb, sp->vlgrp,
===== drivers/net/tg3.c 1.523 vs edited =====
--- 1.523/drivers/net/tg3.c 2007-09-11 04:28:44 -04:00
+++ edited/drivers/net/tg3.c 2007-11-05 09:38:33 -05:00
@@ -3417,7 +3417,7 @@
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, tp->dev);
#if TG3_VLAN_TAG_USED
- if (tp->vlgrp != NULL &&
+ if ((tp->vlgrp || (tp->tg3_flags & TG3_FLAG_ENABLE_ASF)) &&
desc->type_flags & RXD_FLAG_VLAN) {
tg3_vlan_rx(tp, skb,
desc->err_vlan & RXD_VLAN_MASK);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-05 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-31 18:43 expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? Dave Johnson
2007-10-31 19:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-01 1:06 ` Ben Greear
2007-11-01 1:10 ` David Miller
2007-11-01 1:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-01 1:31 ` Ben Greear
2007-11-01 4:50 ` David Miller
2007-11-01 15:04 ` Ben Greear
2007-11-01 21:35 ` David Miller
2007-11-01 21:36 ` Dave Johnson
2007-11-01 21:48 ` Rick Jones
2007-11-01 21:59 ` David Miller
2007-11-01 22:04 ` Rick Jones
2007-11-01 22:07 ` David Miller
2007-11-01 23:26 ` Rick Jones
2007-11-05 17:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it Dave Johnson
2007-11-05 18:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-05 23:15 ` David Miller
2007-11-06 0:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-06 0:35 ` David Miller
2007-11-06 18:03 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-11-06 18:56 ` Ben Greear
2007-11-06 20:08 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-11-06 23:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-05 17:47 ` Dave Johnson [this message]
2007-11-06 2:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Ramkrishna Vepa
2007-11-06 18:28 ` Ramkrishna Vepa
2007-11-06 18:34 ` Dave Johnson
2007-11-01 21:58 ` expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? David Miller
2007-11-02 18:08 ` Dave Johnson
2007-11-02 21:20 ` David Miller
2007-11-02 21:52 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18223.22296.654548.764588@zeus.sw.starentnetworks.com \
--to=djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com \
--cc=bguo@sw.starentnetworks.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jes@trained-monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ram.vepa@neterion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®