From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from imap5.colo.codethink.co.uk (imap5.colo.codethink.co.uk [78.40.148.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D017308F32; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.40.148.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773755441; cv=none; b=QQUl8X2DWTmQ4owp1AVnp0HS2NhkKK5ScYTQ+sgHeIoy9wog+Ws/WpqLaD9zrzPEZtNt6T7G94QfeddGGQDogrQvBGqwW6F/Ns/AAv+Vc5jqQoCKB+Ba29WJOjXJH3a/yH4jN7ksHq7A7c35fKvh9hx56btForZd7nFmiO9RQO8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773755441; c=relaxed/simple; bh=60m+sC8xedkAw0wCIxpY+XhBnIK+bJdRbfyBuWEq4UE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=KRu6Z1iTfWHgbbM/EDGo6c1RHKuE9jzPi4pXxXXReLcdXGtW9U24IYtM0XAWMPxi7o/xBclZ0oxauFe0XGhTe76ThyK3jMUJpzbEOHg/3tyoU/7lu8RDEn1kuvmOXSq2JjhWjyeniolQUL6GgtdrOvD5V0ITcw7yR7s7tCk/tEQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=codethink.co.uk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codethink.co.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codethink.co.uk header.i=@codethink.co.uk header.b=g4/Jflfm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.40.148.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=codethink.co.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codethink.co.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codethink.co.uk header.i=@codethink.co.uk header.b="g4/Jflfm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codethink.co.uk; s=imap5-20230908; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID: Reply-To; bh=sYFkhEmVfpmSdpk9zru8LsQsRcm++lmR5W2LLFKdA9g=; b=g4/Jflfmw3EwqKVV lRjwVeodNp64CSoP4uQY+9+Cez+2JadXM+l0vbErEW7AqD3YqvC/GC2b8Q7DN46jEUc4d7fEKxvdp AOO6Gh/pdMnhMg1UfO2p2K16tyQAwcpC3X47xU66qon4gdw9U2WCNnIRK28WHUV/XM+iYDSTIB/2K ZywYhIkS0XhR/2UeSKve62UWq0fkL4KfPoe97W2W+LAUs3enWdCh5ZTklrvGFSouUIZ6reQBuPm3S JYOwoeZraKdX9F/ndQFC1B8Uo9HBa7C/kUkhh5S9etoiXXqbj9OJSTOKZE9TE659F6QDxHGdGN2jG xqKo2NpJaOkJL4CH5w==; Received: from [63.135.74.212] (helo=[192.168.1.241]) by imap5.colo.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1w2UoM-009nfE-J8; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:50:18 +0000 Message-ID: <182d2cd5-82f6-41c0-b47a-7626de899f3d@codethink.co.uk> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:50:16 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Update designware pwm driver To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com Cc: ukleinek@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ningyu@eswincomputing.com, linmin@eswincomputing.com, xuxiang@eswincomputing.com, wangguosheng@eswincomputing.com, pinkesh.vaghela@einfochips.com References: <20260306093000.2065-1-dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com> <20260307-intrepid-curly-seagull-e036c4@quoll> Content-Language: en-GB From: Ben Dooks Organization: Codethink Limited. In-Reply-To: <20260307-intrepid-curly-seagull-e036c4@quoll> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk On 07/03/2026 13:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 05:30:00PM +0800, dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com wrote: >> From: Xuyang Dong >> >> There is already a patch [1] for the DesignWare PWM driver, > > So provide review there instead of allowing Ben to post incomplete > hardware description which you want to correct here... > > I don't understand why posting this change. I think the binding got merged a while ago whilst we ended up never getting the go-ahead to finish the driver changes. Unfortunately all the client hardware was returned and we had to destroy all the data from them. -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html