From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C065C282C2 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3376C2070B for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392374AbfBMRNg (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:13:36 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:46528 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729760AbfBMRNg (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:13:36 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2019 09:13:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,366,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="126187440" Received: from rbhardw1-mobl.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.68.82]) ([10.252.68.82]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2019 09:13:31 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/cpu: Add Icelake to Intel family To: Dave Hansen , Borislav Petkov Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Hansen , "David E. Box" , Srinivas Pandruvada References: <20190213150810.32750-1-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com> <20190213150810.32750-7-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com> <20190213152326.GA1883@zn.tnic> <308aa852-b2c3-3336-707f-d54de6ad77b7@linux.intel.com> <20190213160405.GC1883@zn.tnic> <46ad3b08-b96b-6ef2-a5e4-fb0865865916@intel.com> From: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" Message-ID: <1836a770-86ce-fc34-f7fd-6d1692fa184a@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:43:30 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <46ad3b08-b96b-6ef2-a5e4-fb0865865916@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13-Feb-19 10:10 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 2/13/19 8:35 AM, Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote: >> I sure did, perhaps it wasn't clear in my response. I can remove >> coreboot link in next version but please clarify whether i should keep >> other link that i mentioned or just keep the commit without any link? > I think we're hearing loud and clear from the maintainers that they > prefer *public*, official documentation from Intel to back up our patches. > > Barring that, they'd rather have no link than a link to some other > random project. Thank you Dave for the clarification. Hi Borislav, I realize that the link i mentioned is not public. Apologies for creating confusion around that and for the previous top posting.  I will drop references to the coreboot link too in the next version. >