From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759286AbYB2LQV (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:16:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753838AbYB2LQK (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:16:10 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:43169 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753531AbYB2LQJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:16:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18375.59486.392919.984544@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:11:26 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Alexey Zaytsev , Thomas Gleixner , lkml Subject: Re: printk timestamps jumping back and forth in 2.6.25-rc. In-Reply-To: <20080228201613.GA30999@elte.hu> References: <20080228201315.GA30736@elte.hu> <20080228201613.GA30999@elte.hu> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar writes: > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Anything else I can do? > > > > yes, please test the patch below - does it fix the problem? > > (assuming you prefer patches that build, here's an updated one below.) Is this patch going to add overhead? On powerpc we use the timebase register, which is synchronized across CPUs, so if this will add unnecessary overhead, we will want to way to turn it off on powerpc (assuming this ends up going upstream). Paul.