From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932309AbWDLST3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:19:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932310AbWDLST3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:19:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:41138 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932309AbWDLST2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:19:28 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1144864128.8056.8.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <1144864128.8056.8.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20060411150512.5dd6e83d.akpm@osdl.org> <16476.1144773375@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <17771.1144839377@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Trond Myklebust Cc: David Howells , Andrew Morton , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use atomic ops for file_nr accounting, not spinlock+irq X-Mailer: MH-E 7.92+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50.4 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:19:18 +0100 Message-ID: <18424.1144865958@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Trond Myklebust wrote: > I've been updating the NFS git tree on a daily basis. I'm not going to > begin pulling from the -mm tree, though. The thing to which I refer is in Linus's tree but wasn't in yours this morning. Unfortunately, this means my patch has to be different, depending on whose tree I'm using... although your tree has been updated since then, so the difference seems to have gone away. I don't mean to be critical of your efforts, but the requirement imposed by Andrew that I have to base my tree on yours makes things a little tricky sometimes:-/ David