mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Daniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [3.8-rc7] PCI hotplug wakeup oops
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:49:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1843565.7Y1sC8j6FG@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6086479.ycKj2j8yeP@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Monday, February 11, 2013 08:27:49 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 11, 2013 12:01:37 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Rafael]
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org> wrote:
> > > On 11 February 2013 21:03, Daniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org> wrote:
> > >> With 3.8-rc7, when unplugging the Thunderbolt ethernet adapter (bus 0a
> > >> [1]) on a Macbook Pro 10,1, we see the PCIe port correctly released:
> > >>
> > >> pciehp 0000:06:03.0:pcie24: Card not present on Slot(3)
> > >> tg3 0000:0a:00.0: tg3_abort_hw timed out, TX_MODE_ENABLE will not
> > >> clear MAC_TX_MODE=ffffffff
> > >> tg3 0000:0a:00.0 eth0: No firmware running
> > >> tg3 0000:0a:00.0 eth0: Link is down
> > >> [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated
> > >> pcieport 0000:00:01.1: System wakeup enabled by ACPI
> > >> pciehp 0000:09:00.0:pcie24: unloading service driver pciehp
> > >> pci_bus 0000:0a: busn_res: [bus 0a] is released
> > >> pci_bus 0000:09: busn_res: [bus 09-0a] is released
> > >>
> > >> After some activity later (eg I can reproduce this by switching to a
> > >> text console and back), often we'll see an oops:
> > >>
> > >> Unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000001070
> > >> pci_pme_list_scan+0x3d/0xe0
> > >> Call Trace:
> > >> process_one_work+0x193
> > >> ? process_one_work+0x131
> > >> ? pci_pme_wakeup+0x60
> > >> worker_thread+0x15d
> > >>
> > >> (gdb) list *(pci_pme_list_scan+0x3d)
> > >> 0xffffffff8123f6dd is in pci_pme_list_scan (drivers/pci/pci.c:1556).
> > >> 1551                                    /*
> > >> 1552                                     * If bridge is in low power state, the
> > >> 1553                                     * configuration space of subordinate devices
> > >> 1554                                     * may be not accessible
> > >> 1555                                     */
> > >> 1556                                    if (bridge && bridge->current_state != PCI_D0)
> > >> 1557                                            continue;
> > >> 1558                                    pci_pme_wakeup(pme_dev->dev, NULL);
> > >> 1559                            } else {
> > >> 1560                                    list_del(&pme_dev->list);
> > >>
> > >> Since a panic in vsnprintf happens after the oops (hence I can't catch
> > >> it with EFI pstore), it is almost certainly significant heap
> > >> corruption; this would explain why pme_dev became null (the load has
> > >> been ordered ahead).
> > >>
> > >> I'll see what I can find out with memory poisoning and list debugging.
> > >
> > > Enabling a bunch of related debugging, we see pme_dev is non-null and:
> > >
> > > BUG: Unable to handle NULL pointer dereference at
> > > pci_bus_read_config_word+0x6c
> > > PGD 26314c067 PUD 2633f9067 PMD 0
> > > Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > > pci_check_pme_status+0x4f
> > > pci_pme_wakeup+0x21
> > > pci_pme_list_scan+0xd5
> > > process_one_work+0x1ca
> > > ? process_one_work+0x160
> > > ? pci_pme_wakeup+0x60
> > > worker_thread+0x14e
> > >
> > > Anyway, it looks like the device being unplugged wasn't removed from
> > > pci_pme_list as pci_pme_active(dev, false) wasn't called.
> > >
> > > From a quick review, I wasn't able to find the right place in the
> > > call-chain which I only see releases the child busses and PCIe port
> > > drivers. Anyone?
> > 
> > It looks like drivers *add* devices to pci_pme_list when they use
> > pci_enable_wake() or pci_wake_from_d3().  But many drivers never
> > remove their devices, and I don't see any place where the core does it
> > either.  My guess is we need to remove it in pci_stop_dev() (we
> > already do pcie_aspm_exit_link_state() there) or somewhere similar.
> 
> Yes, we should call pci_pme_active(dev, false) somewhere in there I think.
> It's fine to call that even if PME was not "active" before.

Daniel, I wonder if the patch below helps?

Rafael


Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/pci/remove.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Index: test/drivers/pci/remove.c
===================================================================
--- test.orig/drivers/pci/remove.c
+++ test/drivers/pci/remove.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ static void pci_free_resources(struct pc
 
 static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
+	pci_pme_active(dev, false);
+
 	if (dev->is_added) {
 		pci_proc_detach_device(dev);
 		pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files(dev);



-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-11 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-11 13:03 Daniel J Blueman
2013-02-11 17:08 ` Daniel J Blueman
2013-02-11 19:01   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-11 19:27     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-11 19:49       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-02-12  2:18         ` Daniel J Blueman
2013-02-12 20:53           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-12 20:50             ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-12 21:00               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-13 14:32         ` Daniel J Blueman
2013-02-13 19:29           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-13 20:55             ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1843565.7Y1sC8j6FG@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=daniel@quora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®